| |
Web URL(s): | https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2018am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/112210 Last checked: 11/15/2018 Requires: JavaScript |
Publication Type:
| Report |
Content Type: | Abstract or Summary only |
Author(s): | Evans, Shane R.;
Kopp, Kelly L.;
Johnson, Paul G.;
Hopkins, Bryan G. |
Author Affiliation: | Evans, Kopp, and Johnson: Utah State University, Logan, UT; Hopkins: Brigham Young University, Provo, UT |
Title: | A comparison of smart controllers in the urban landscape |
Section: | C05 turfgrass science Other records with the "C05 turfgrass science" Section
Turfgrass management and ecology poster (Includes student competition) Other records with the "Turfgrass management and ecology poster (Includes student competition)" Section
|
Meeting Info.: | Baltimore, Maryland: November 4-7, 2018 |
Source: | ASA, CSSA and SSSA International Annual Meetings. 2018, p. 112210. |
Publishing Information: | [Madison, Wisconsin]: [American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Canadian Society of Agronomy] |
# of Pages: | 1 |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Aesthetic values; Irrigation controllers; Irrigation efficiency; Irrigation scheduling; Water conservation; Water use efficiency
|
Abstract/Contents: | "Water use within the United States has increased with population growth. This trend of water use is also observed within the urban environment. Urban landscapes require water to thrive, and a higher percentage of municipal water is being used to keep these areas aesthetically pleasing. With a limited amount of water resources, water conservation efforts have increased. As irrigation technologies improve, newly developed smart controllers allow homeowners to control water use from their phone. Compared to manually programmed controllers, a smart controller makes changes to an irrigation schedule based on conditions within each watering zone and local weather data. This study aims to discover how efficient three brands of smart controllers are by measuring total water use and comparing the physiological plant responses of each Kentucky bluegrass stand (Poa Pratensis L.). The data from each brand of controller will be compared to one another and the control of the experiment. The results will help determine which smart controller is most water efficient while continuing to provide aesthetic value." |
Language: | English |
References: | 0 |
Note: | This item is an abstract only! "Poster Number: 1260" |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): Evans, S. R., K. L. Kopp, P. G. Johnson, and B. G. Hopkins. 2018. A comparison of smart controllers in the urban landscape. Agron. Abr. p. 112210. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=302163 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 302163. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| Web URL(s): https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2018am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/112210 Last checked: 11/15/2018 Requires: JavaScript |
| Find from within TIC: Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |