Full TGIF Record # 302192
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2018am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/112525
    Last checked: 11/16/2018
    Requires: JavaScript
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Hopkins, Bryan G.; Hopkins, Tyler J.
Author Affiliation:Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
Title:Enhanced efficiency fertilizers in turfgrass: A review
Section:C05 turfgrass science
Other records with the "C05 turfgrass science" Section

Turfgrass science and management: Soil, plant nutrition, and the environment oral
Other records with the "Turfgrass science and management: Soil, plant nutrition, and the environment oral" Section
Meeting Info.:Baltimore, Maryland: November 4-7, 2018
Source:ASA, CSSA and SSSA International Annual Meetings. 2018, p. 112525.
Publishing Information:[Madison, Wisconsin]: [American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Canadian Society of Agronomy]
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Fertilizer evaluation; Nutrient concentration; Soil fertility; Soil testing
Abstract/Contents:"Nutrition is vital for any organism to grow and overcome stresses and infections. Unfortunately, correct nutrition principles are often misunderstood. The emphasis of this review is to survey the wide body of literature regarding turfgrass nutrition and compare/contrast this with field research plots where these various approaches have been compared. The use of soil and plant tissue testing will be discussed, as well as the rate, placement, and timing of various enhanced efficiency fertilizers. A meta-analysis of surveyed studied shows that turfgrass response to nitrogen fertilizers is common and dramatic-impacting verdure and growth significantly in greater than 92% of the studies. Prediction of response was correlated to soil test, but the approaches are not typically consistent. In contrast, potassium and sulfur responses were much less common at 24 and 21%, respectively. With potassium, response was reasonably predicted by soil test, with responses mostly with regard to growth (rate and architecture) and/or water relations when soil test values were low. Alternatively, sulfur response was typically related to verdure mostly, but was not predicted by the sulfur soil test, but was most likely when soil organic matter levels were low (<2%, such as is commonly observed in sands). Phosphorus response was even more rare, at only 9% of studies showing a response. Similar to potassium, response to phosphorus was related to soil test, but response cut-off was much lower than for most other plant specie-spresumably due to high concentrations of both roots and phosphorus in the top soil. Responses to other nutrients (calcium, magnesium, zinc, iron, manganese, copper, boron, and chloride) were raretypically only occurring in very sandy, low organic matter soil."
Language:English
References:0
Note:This item is an abstract only!
"308-5"
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Hopkins, B. G., and T. J. Hopkins. 2018. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers in turfgrass: A review. Agron. Abr. p. 112525.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=302192
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 302192.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2018am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/112525
    Last checked: 11/16/2018
    Requires: JavaScript
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
   Related material digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)