Web URL(s): https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/ressum/2019/2019.pdf#page=238 Publication Type:
i
Report Author(s): Dyer, W. ;
Bremer, D. ;
Patrignani, A. ;
Fry, J. ;
Hoyle, J. ;
Friell, J. Author Affiliation: Dyer, Bremer, Fry, and Hoyle: Dept. Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State Univ.; Patrignani: Dept. Agronomy, Kansas State Univ.; Friell: Toro Co. Title: Comparison of irrigation scheduling methods Section: Integrated turfgrass managementOther records with the "Integrated turfgrass management" Section Other records with the "Ecophysiology: Water" Section Source: Turfgrass and Environmental Research Program: 2019 Research Summaries . 2019, p. 230-234.# of Pages: 5 Publishing Information: [New York, New York]: The United States Golf Association Green Section Keywords: TIC Keywords: Comparisons ; Irrigation methods ; Irrigation scheduling ; Soil moisture sensors ; Water conservation Language: English References: 2 See Also: Other Reports from this USGA research project: 2017-38-648 Note: Graphs USGA Summary Points: Irrigation threshold was determined based on the fraction of plant available water at which the turfgrass showed sign of water stress. Integrating soil moisture and canopy information from in-situ sensors has the potential to improve the timing and amount of irrigation events during the growing season. Soil moisture sensor-based irrigation saved the most water compared to traditional frequency-based irrigation and deficit irrigation (60% ET) approaches. ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science -Like - may be incomplete ): USGA Turfgrass Environ. Res. Summ. p. 230-234.Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=310856 If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 310856 . Choices for finding the above item : Web URL(s): https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/ressum/2019/2019.pdf#page=238 b3609415 Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)
