Full TGIF Record # 311298
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://bioone.org/journals/weed-technology/volume-33/issue-6/wet.2019.60/Measurement-of-foliar-spray-retention-on-creeping-bentgrass/10.1017/wet.2019.60.full
    Last checked: 11/05/2020
https://bioone.org/journalArticle/Download?fullDOI=10.1017%2Fwet.2019.60
    Last checked: 11/04/2020
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Direct download
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Zhang, Pingyuan; Branham, Bruce E.
Author Affiliation:Zhang: Former Graduate Student, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL; and Branham: Professor, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
Title:Measurement of foliar spray retention on creeping bentgrass
Source:Weed Technology. Vol. 33, No. 6, August 19 2019, p. 827-832.
Publishing Information:Champaign, Illinois: Weed Science Society of America
# of Pages:6
Related Web URL:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weed-technology/article/measurement-of-foliar-spray-retention-on-creeping-bentgrass/69662B1CB081EF97ABDCA80C653F3183#
    Last checked: 11/04/2020
    Notes: Item description page
Related DOI10.1017/wet.2019.60 (Item description page)
Keywords:Author-Supplied Keywords: Adjuvant; Dew; Foliar retention efficiency; Nozzle type; Spray volume; Tartrazine
Abstract/Contents:"Experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of spray volume, nozzle type, adjuvants, the presence of dew, and their interactions on foliar retention of creeping bentgrass. Tartrazine, a common food dye, was used as a tracer in this study. Increasing spray volume from 95 L ha-1 to 1,500 L ha-1 decreased foliar retention efficiency from 98% to approximately 85%. Compared with flat-fan nozzles, air-induction nozzles delivered similar retention efficiency at all spray volumes evaluated. However, flat-fan nozzles provided higher uniformity and more thorough coverage. Adding nonionic surfactants, organosilicone adjuvants, or methylated seed oils at typical concentrations yielded retention efficiency of approximately 90% to 93% regardless of spray volumes. In contrast, with water alone, increasing spray volume reduced retention efficiency from 95.9% to 87.3%. Simulated dew applied at 1,950 L ha-1 increased retention efficiency by approximately 3% when spray application volume was 190 L ha-1, while no difference was observed at 750 L ha-1. The presence of dew reduced the impact of adjuvants on retention efficiency. Large quantities of dew, 3,800 L ha-1, did reduce retention efficiency."
Language:English
References:32
Note:Pictures, color
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Zhang, P., and B. E. Branham. 2019. Measurement of foliar spray retention on creeping bentgrass. Weed Technol. 33(6):p. 827-832.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=311298
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 311298.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://bioone.org/journals/weed-technology/volume-33/issue-6/wet.2019.60/Measurement-of-foliar-spray-retention-on-creeping-bentgrass/10.1017/wet.2019.60.full
    Last checked: 11/05/2020
https://bioone.org/journalArticle/Download?fullDOI=10.1017%2Fwet.2019.60
    Last checked: 11/04/2020
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Direct download
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2174615a
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)