Full TGIF Record # 315934
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1002/csc2.20506
Web URL(s):https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/csc2.20506
    Last checked: 11/12/2021
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/csc2.20506
    Last checked: 11/12/2021
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Breuillin-Sessoms, Florence; Petrella, Dominic P.; Trappe, Jon M.; Mihelich, Nicole T.; Patton, Aaron J.; Watkins, Eric
Author Affiliation:Breuillin-Sessoms, Petrella, Trappe, Mihelich, and Watkins: Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN; Patton: Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Title:Field evaluation of weed suppression in fine fescue (Festuca spp.)
Section:Turfgrass science
Other records with the "Turfgrass science" Section

Original research article
Other records with the "Original research article" Section
Source:Crop Science. Vol. 61, No. 4, July/August 2021, p. 2812-2826.
Publishing Information:Madison, Wisconsin: Crop Science Society of America
# of Pages:15
Related Web URL:https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/csc2.20506
    Last checked: 11/12/2021
    Notes: Abstract only
Abstract/Contents:"Weed suppression has been observed in the fine fescues, a group of low-input turfgrasses. Of the fine fescues, Chewings fescue (Festuca rubra L. ssp. commutata Gaudin; CH) and strong creeping red fescue (F. rubra L. ssp. rubra Gaudin; ST) displayed the strongest weed suppression ability in previous research while hard fescue (F. brevipila Tracey; HF) did not appear to have the same level of suppression. However, most of this research occurred more than 10 years ago and did not lead to improved cultivars. There is a need for confirmation of these results using diverse germplasm that may have genetic variability for weed suppression; this information would be useful for turfgrass breeding efforts. Our objective was to screen for weed suppression abilities in 19 fine fescue accessions originally collected in Europe, at two distinct field locations, St. Paul, MN and West Lafayette, IN, infested with smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb.) Schreb. ex Muhl.). Our results confirmed previous reports that the F. rubra taxa are more crabgrass suppressive than HF. Chewings fescue and slender creeping red fescue [F. rubra L. ssp. littoralis (G. Mey.) Auquier; SL] displayed the strongest ability to suppress smooth crabgrass. Results also indicated that there is large variability between the entries within each taxon, including within HF. Slender creeping red fescues were relatively more weed suppressive than previously shown, and this taxon needs further attention. Results suggest further opportunities for plant breeders to develop new weed suppressive cultivars for low-input turfgrass systems."
Language:English
References:45
Note:Pictures, color
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Breuillin-Sessoms, F., D. P. Petrella, J. M. Trappe, N. T. Mihelich, A. J. Patton, and E. Watkins. 2021. Field evaluation of weed suppression in fine fescue (Festuca spp.). Crop Sci. 61(4):p. 2812-2826.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=315934
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 315934.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20506
Web URL(s):
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/csc2.20506
    Last checked: 11/12/2021
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/csc2.20506
    Last checked: 11/12/2021
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2211522a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)