| |
| DOI: | 10.1080/01426397.2020.1864819 |
|---|
| Web URL(s): | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01426397.2020.1864819?scroll=top&needAccess=true
Last checked: 11/16/2021
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01426397.2020.1864819
Last checked: 11/16/2021
Requires: PDF Reader |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Refereed |
|---|
| Author(s): | Dobson, Julian;
Dempsey, Nicola |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Dobson: Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK; Dempsey: Senior Lecturer, Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK |
|---|
| Title: | Known but not done: How logics of inaction limit the benefits of urban green spaces |
|---|
| Section: | Regular articles
Other records with the "Regular articles" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | Landscape Research. Vol. 46, No. 3, 2021, p. 390-402. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Manchester, United Kingdom: The Landscape Research Group |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 14 |
|---|
| Related Web URL: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2020.1864819
Last checked: 11/16/2021
Notes: Abstract only |
|---|
| Keywords: | Author-Supplied Keywords: Urban greenspace; Wellbeing; Empirical evidence; Logics of inaction; Greenspace governance; Local context
|
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Empirical research has long shown positive connections between urban green spaces and their users wellbeing. But compelling evidence does not always lead to appropriate investment. In a study of the contribution of urban nature to mental wellbeing in Sheffield, UK, the authors identified greenspace investments that could lead to improved wellbeing and discussed their implementation with local stakeholders. However, this qualitative study also revealed a series of reasons why stakeholders in Sheffield would not proceed with such investments. Using the concept of logics of inaction to examine stakeholders reasoning, this paper considers why such logics arise. It finds a mismatch between available evidence and the evidence practitioners say they need to justify investments. One consequence is that practitioners capacity to act on new knowledge is reduced, limiting innovation and potential benefits." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 63 |
|---|
| Note: | Tables |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Dobson, J., and N. Dempsey. 2021. Known but not done: How logics of inaction limit the benefits of urban green spaces. Landscape Research. 46(3):p. 390-402. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=316006 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 316006. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2020.1864819 |
| Web URL(s):
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01426397.2020.1864819?scroll=top&needAccess=true
Last checked: 11/16/2021
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01426397.2020.1864819
Last checked: 11/16/2021
Requires: PDF Reader |
| 
MSU catalog number: b2192689 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
