Full TGIF Record # 31982
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.21273/JASHS.119.6.1317
Web URL(s):https://journals.ashs.org/jashs/view/journals/jashs/119/6/article-p1317.xml?rskey=brYbBU
    Last checked: 11/12/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Zhao, Yuguang; Fernandez, George C. J.; Bowman, Daniel C.; Nowak, Robert S.
Author Affiliation:Graduate Student; Associate Professor, Plant Breeding & Biometrics; Associate Professor, Biochemistry; Associate Professor, Environmental & Resource Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Nevada, Reno, NV
Title:Selection criteria for drought-resistance breeding in turfgrass
Source:Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. Vol. 119, No. 6, November 1994, p. 1317-1324.
Publishing Information:Alexandria, VA: American Society for Horticultural Science
# of Pages:8
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Water management; Water stress; Canopy temperature; Drought; Breeding; Cool season turfgrasses; Models; Evapotranspiration
Abstract/Contents:"Cumulative evapotranspiration (ET cum) patterns of 10 commercially available cool-season turfgrass species and cultivars were evaluated under progressive water stress in the semi-field conditions using a gravimetric mass balance method in three studies. At the end of water stress, the cultivars were visually scored for green appearance on a 0 (no green) to 10 (100% green) scale. A Gompertz nonlinear model gave a best fit to ET cum vs. days adjusted for pan evaporation variation. Two of the ET cum attributes (ti, the time during which the rate change in ET is zero, and ET max, the maximum ET rate) estimated from the Gompertz model appeared to reflect efficient water-use attributes in the turfgrass. Among the physiological screening techniques studied, electrolyte leakage, relative water content, and the difference between canopy and air temperature appeared to separate cultivars by drought resistance and water use efficiency (WUE). These physiological attributes were also relatively easy to measure and had high correlations with color score and WUE. Biplot display is a graphical technique in which the interrelationships between the cultivars and water-use attributes can be displayed together. Based on ti, ET max, color score, and physiological attributes, 'Wabash' and 'Bristol' Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), 'Aurora' hard fescue (Festuca ovina var. duriuscula L. Koch.), and 'FRT-30149' fine fescue (F. rubra L.) were identified as cultivars with higher WUE."
Language:English
References:24
Note:Figures
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Zhao, Y., G. C. J. Fernandez, D. C. Bowman, and R. S. Nowak. 1994. Selection criteria for drought-resistance breeding in turfgrass. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 119(6):p. 1317-1324.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=31982
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 31982.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.21273/JASHS.119.6.1317
Web URL(s):
https://journals.ashs.org/jashs/view/journals/jashs/119/6/article-p1317.xml?rskey=brYbBU
    Last checked: 11/12/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 1 .A46
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)