Full TGIF Record # 36931
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2261698.pdf
    Last checked: 10/06/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Hulme, Philip E.
Author Affiliation:Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks. SL5 7PY, UK
Title:Herbivores and the performance of grassland plants: a comparison of arthropod, mollusk and rodent herbivory
Source:Journal of Ecology. Vol. 84, No. 1, February 1996, p. 43-51.
Publishing Information:Blackwell Scientific Publications
# of Pages:9
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Plant communities; Plant density; Mollusca; Herbivores; Rodentia; Biomass; Compensation point; Root weight
Abstract/Contents:"A field experiment involving exclosure techniques was used to assess the relative roles of arthropods, molluscs and rodent herbivores in the survival and growth of temperate grassland plants. The study focused on the impact of herbivores on plant survival, above-ground biomass and root weight ratios of 21 plant species which were sown experimentally in a grassland and meadow. Of the three herbivore groups studied, rodents exerted the greatest influence on plant performance, reducing plant biomass by as much as 50% and substantially increasing plant mortality. Molluscs significantly decreased plant numbers but plants appeared more able to compensate for biomass lost through grazing. By comparison, arthropods played only a minor role in determining either plant biomass or survival. Positive correlations in the responses of plant species to herbivory by molluscs and rodents indicate that the major difference in the impact of these two guilds of herbivors on plant performance (survival, biomass and root weight ratio) is in the magnitude rather than the direction of the plant response. Legumes were more susceptible to herbivory than grasses, exhibiting both lower survival and greater loss of biomass. Results indicate that where resources are limiting, as in the meadow, the direct influence of herbivores on plant numbers is minimal since herbivore induces mortality is only one component of naturally low plant survival. In contrast, the influence of herbivores on plant growth can be considerable since plant are often unable to compensate for tissue loss via regrowth. Thus, in the grassland, the overall influence of herbivores was on plant numbers whereas in the meadow their main impact was on mean plant biomass. Although the majority of the variation in both plant survival and biomass occurred independently of the experimental treatments, with almost 50% attributable to intrinsic species effects, indirect evidence reveals herbivores to have an impact on plant community composition. Plants which suffer both high mortality and poor growth as a result of herbivory (e.g. Trifolium repens, T. pratense) are rare while those plant whose performance is little influnced by herbivores (e.g. Agrostis capillaris, Dactylis glomerata, Plantango lanceolata) are abundant in the grassland communities studied."
Language:English
References:38
Note:Figures
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Hulme, P. E. 1996. Herbivores and the performance of grassland plants: a comparison of arthropod, mollusk and rodent herbivory. J. Ecol. 84(1):p. 43-51.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=36931
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 36931.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2261698.pdf
    Last checked: 10/06/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: QH 540 .J6
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)