Full TGIF Record # 38975
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199610)48:2<179::AID-PS457>3.0.CO;2-M/epdf
    Last checked: 10/07/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Reddy, Krishna N.; Locke, Martin A.
Author Affiliation:Southern Weed Science Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, PO Box 350, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
Title:Imazaquin spray retention, foliar washoff and runoff losses under simulated rainfall
Source:Pesticide Science. Vol. 48, No. 2, October 1996, p. 179-187.
Publishing Information:London : Society of Chemical Industry
# of Pages:8
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Imazaquin; Spray retention; Surface runoff; Precipitation; Adjuvants; Surfactants
Abstract/Contents:"Spray retention and foliar washoff of imazaquin in smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L.) and sicklepod (Denna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby) were investigated. Imazaquin (70 g AI haā‚‹ā‚) was applied alone with nonionic surfactant 'X-77' or organosilicone-based nonionic surfactant 'Kinetic' to plants at two- to five-leaf stage and subjected to 2.5 cm rainfall in 20 min either 1 or 24 h after application. Imazaquin spray retention was higher with adjuvants than without. Retention was similar between adjuvants in smooth pigweed but 'Kinetic' retained twice as much imazaquin as 'X-77' in sicklepod. Rainfall 1 h after application washed off three-quarters of foliar residues regardless of plant species or adjuvant. However, at 24 h after application, foliar washoff was lowest with 'Kinetic' followed by 'X-77' in both species. Imazaquin washoff ranged from 33 to 88% in the two species at 24 h after application. Overall, imazaquin activity was similar with either adjuvant in smooth pigweed but 'Kinetic' was more effective than 'X-77' in sicklepod. Runoff losses from the surface of a Bosket sandy loam (Mollic Hapludalfs) soil in runoff trays (1.2% slope) were also studied. Imazaquin was applied as above to trays with and without smooth pigweed canopy. A 2.5-cm rainfall was applied in 20 min at 24 h after application. Runoff samples collected in one-litre fractions were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Sediment (but not water) in runoff was greatly reduced (56%) by pigweed cover as compared to bare trays. Imazaquin in the first litre of runoff was higher than in subsequent runoff fractions regardless of pigweed cover. Total imazaquin lost in runoff was higher in pigweed cover (23%) than in bare trays (16% of applied). Imazaquin concentration in 10-20 cm soil depth in pigweed cover trays was higher than in bare trays. These results suggest that imazaquin is vulnerable to foliar washoff and the herbicide washed off could move in the aqueous phase due to shorter contact time with soil for sorption."
Language:English
References:32
Note:Figures
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Reddy, K. N., and M. A. Locke. 1996. Imazaquin spray retention, foliar washoff and runoff losses under simulated rainfall. Pest Manage. Sci. 48(2):p. 179-187.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=38975
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 38975.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199610)48:2<179::AID-PS457>3.0.CO;2-M/epdf
    Last checked: 10/07/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 951 .A1 P45
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)