Full TGIF Record # 40071
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J099v02n01_01
    Last checked: Item not verified
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
    Notes: Abstract and Guide page only
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Ngoya, Cesar; Hensley, David; Murdoch, Charles
Author Affiliation:College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Department of Horticulture, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822
Title:Evaluation of recycled glass and compost as a turfgrass media
Source:Journal of Turfgrass Management. Vol. 2, No. 1, 1997, p. 1-14.
# of Pages:14
Publishing Information:Binghamton, NY: Food Products Press (Haworth Press)
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Golf greens; Organic matter; Composts; Sand; Porosity; USGA recommendations; Tests; Soil water retention; Bulk density
Abstract/Contents:"Analysis of the particle size distribution of a Maui and Oahu glass sand and an imported silica sand indicated that only the Oahu glass sand met USGA guidelines for greens construction without additional screening. Bulk density, total porosity, capillary pore space, air-filled pore space, and water retention capacity of the silica and Oahu glass sand alone and with 4:1 (v:v) mixtures of several sources of organic matter were measured. Total porosity, capillary porosity, total air-filled porosity, and water retention capacity in the various mixtures of silica sand were lower than the USGA recommendations for putting greens. Organic matter-Oahu glass sand mixes had the desired bulk density and total porosity for putting greens in most instances, although performance of specific organic matters and composts varied with individual tests. Water retention capacity (or capillary porosity) and air-filled porosity of glass sand-organic matter mixtures were beyond the recommended range. Macademia husk compost and manure compost appeared to have the greatest potential of the organic materials in this study. Additional testing is required to determine suitability of specific organic materials as substitute for peat moss. Common bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] turf grew satisfactorily in all of the different mixtures."
Language:English
References:14
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Ngoya, C., D. Hensley, and C. Murdoch. 1997. Evaluation of recycled glass and compost as a turfgrass media. J. Turfgrass Manage. 2(1):p. 1-14.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=40071
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 40071.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J099v02n01_01
    Last checked: Item not verified
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
    Notes: Abstract and Guide page only
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 433 .J68
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)