| |
| Publication Type:
| Professional |
|---|
| Author(s): | Skorupa, Paul |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Precision Group |
|---|
| Title: | Liquid vs. granular: The lawn care debate |
|---|
| Section: | Lawn care technician
Other records with the "Lawn care technician" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | ProSource. Vol. 13, No. 4, Winter 1994 [1993], p. 7-8. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Marietta, Georgia: Professional Lawn Care Association of America |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 2 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Lawn turf; Nitrogen; Fertilization; Liquids
|
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Proper fertilization of turfgrass is one of the 'big three' in good cultural practices. Proper fertilization, watering and mowing are crucial to the development and maintenance of quality turf. A properly fertilized lawn will also tolerate heat, cold, and drought, and have better wear tolerance. It will also allow the turf to survive and recuperate from attacks from insects and diseases. A good fertilization program will supply a lawn with all of the nutrients it needs throughout the entire growing season..." Argues whether fertilizer applications should be in a liquid form or a dry/granular form. Also discusses quick release and slow release advantages and disadvantages. |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| Note: | Includes sidebar, "Nitrogen sources: Quick release vs. slow release", p. 7 |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Skorupa, P. 1994 [1993]. Liquid vs. granular: The lawn care debate. ProSource. 13(4):p. 7-8. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=42319 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 42319. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| 
MSU catalog number: b4004363a |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
