| |
| Web URL(s): | http://web.archive.org/web/20060922002333/http://virtual.clemson.edu/groups/turfornamental/sctop/turfsec/plpanem/PlPaNem3/study06.htm
Last checked: 07/18/2019 |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Report |
|---|
| Author(s): | Martin, S. Bruce;
Jones, William |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Pee Dee Research and Education Center, Clemson University |
|---|
| Title: | Evaluation of polyoxorim formulations and Thalonil and Daconil formulations for [control] of Rhizoctonia blight in 'Penncross' creeping bentgrass |
|---|
| Section: | Plant pathology and nematology
Other records with the "Plant pathology and nematology" Section
Evaluation of experimental and standard fungicides for control of Rhizoctonia blights in creeping bentgrass
Other records with the "Evaluation of experimental and standard fungicides for control of Rhizoctonia blights in creeping bentgrass" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | Clemson University Turfgrass Program. 1997, p. 58-61. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | SC: Clemson University |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 4 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Chlorothalonil; Formulations; Fungicide efficacy; Fungicide evaluation; Polyoxin D
|
|---|
| Cultivar Names: | Penncross |
|---|
| Trade Names: | Thalonil; Daconil |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "The objective was to compare formulations of Polyoxorim, under development by PBI Gordon, for control of Rhizoctonia blight and to compare some formulations of Thalonil and Daconil for control of Rhizoctonia....Concerning polyoxorim, the 2.5% formulation performed somewhat better than the 11.25% in this trial, but differences were minor. This material is a contact fungicide derived from a microorganism. Curative ability was good in this trial, and overall disease control relatively good. Fore fungicide performed very good in this trial, and was better than polyoxorim. Daconil and Thalonil were comparable in efficacy, and were the best materials evaluated in this test. The addition of Aliette did not improve efficacy. The flowable formulation of Thalonil was somewhat better than the 90WDS in this trial. The best turf quality, which was adequate to good, was obtained with the Daconil and Thalonil in comparison to other materials evaluated in this test." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| Note: | "SB 671"
"Revised March 1997"
Tables |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Martin, S. B., and W. Jones. 1997. Evaluation of polyoxorim formulations and Thalonil and Daconil formulations for [control] of Rhizoctonia blight in 'Penncross' creeping bentgrass. Clemson Univ. Turfgrass Progr. p. 58-61. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=47171 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 47171. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
http://web.archive.org/web/20060922002333/http://virtual.clemson.edu/groups/turfornamental/sctop/turfsec/plpanem/PlPaNem3/study06.htm
Last checked: 07/18/2019 |
| 
MSU catalog number: b5345387 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
