Full TGIF Record # 52801
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.21273/HORTSCI.33.4.689
Web URL(s):https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/abstract/journals/hortsci/33/4/article-p689.xml
    Last checked: 11/13/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Jiang, Hongfei; Fry, Jack D.; Wiest, Steve C.
Author Affiliation:Department of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreation Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5506
Title:Variability in turfgrass water requirements on a golf course
Section:Turf management
Other records with the "Turf management" Section
Source:HortScience. Vol. 33, No. 4, July 1998, p. 689-691.
Publishing Information:Alexandria, VA: American Society for Horticultural Science
# of Pages:3
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Microclimate; Golf courses; Water requirements; Evapotranspiration; Weather stations
Facility Names:Manhattan Country Club, in Manhattan, Kansas
Abstract/Contents:"Microclimates can vary significantly across a golf course, and directly influence turf irrigation requirements. The objective of this study was to quantify the extent of this variability in water demand, and evaluate the accuracy of weather station-generated evapotranspiration (ET) estimates for determining irrigation need for one Kansas golf course. Evaporation was measured using black Bellani plate atmometers placed on four golf tees and near the weather station at the Manhattan Country Club, Manhattan, Kans., in 1995 and 1996. Evaporation was measured on a total of 62 precipitation-free summer days in 1995 and 1996. Probably because the weather station was situated over nonirrigated turf, evaporation at the weather station was up to 22% higher than that at locations on tees. Evaporation varied by >20% among tees. Evaporation on a north-facing slope was 8% lower than that on a level surface or south-facing slope. Weather station-estimated empirical ET (Penman model) was consistently higher than ET estimated from atmometer evaporation, particularly when ET was >4 mm·day⁻¹. Superintendents should be aware of the potential variability in water demand across a golf course, and that weather-station ET estimates may differ from turf ET primarily because of microclimatic differences and potential inaccuracies in the empirical model employed by the weather station to estimate turf ET."
Language:English
References:11
Note:Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Jiang, H., J. D. Fry, and S. C. Wiest. 1998. Variability in turfgrass water requirements on a golf course. HortScience. 33(4):p. 689-691.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=52801
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 52801.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.33.4.689
Web URL(s):
https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/abstract/journals/hortsci/33/4/article-p689.xml
    Last checked: 11/13/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 1 .H64
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)