Full TGIF Record # 53560
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://web.archive.org/web/20020824165441/http://virtual.clemson.edu/groups/turfornamental/sctop/turfsec/plpanem/PlPaNem3/study01.htm
    Last checked: 07/18/2013
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Martin, S. Bruce; Jones, William
Author Affiliation:Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Pee Dee Research and Education Center, Clemson University
Title:Evaluation of Daconil and Daconil-tank mix fungicide treatments for control of Rhizoctonia blight in 'Pennlinks' creeping bentgrass
Section:Plant pathology and nematology
Other records with the "Plant pathology and nematology" Section

Evaluation of experimental and standard fungicides for control of Rhizoctonia blights in creeping bentgrass
Other records with the "Evaluation of experimental and standard fungicides for control of Rhizoctonia blights in creeping bentgrass" Section
Source:Clemson University Turfgrass Program. 1997, p. 40-43.
Publishing Information:SC: Clemson University
# of Pages:4
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Chlorothalonil; Disease control; Fungicide efficacy; Fungicide evaluation; Rhizoctonia blight; Tank mix
Cultivar Names:Pennlinks
Trade Names:Daconil
Abstract/Contents:"The objective was to compare Daconil formulations and Daconil in combination with various tank-mix partners for control of Rhizoctonia blight and summer decline in creeping bentgrass....The best disease control and subsequent turf quality was obtained with Aliette + Fore Flo...The Daconil and Daconil-tank mix combinations provided good disease control, but turf quality was somewhat lesser than that obtained with Aliette + Fore. The addition of Aliette, in this trial, was an advantage, as Aliette + Fore was better than Fore alone. Moderate to poor disease control was obtained with Prostar, with poor turf quality....A low level of dollar spot developed in the plots. The Aliette + Fore controlled the dollar spot better than Fore alone, but other trials indicate that Fore and Aliette, alone or in combination, are poor choices for dollar spot control. The same can be said for Prostar, which has no dollar spot activity. Because dollar spot was not severe, Fore and Aliette + Fore performed relatively well, leading to excellent turf quality. Daconil and Daconil-tank mix combinations also controlled dollar spot in this trial."
Language:English
References:0
Note:"SB 671"
"Revised March 1997"
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Martin, S. B., and W. Jones. 1997. Evaluation of Daconil and Daconil-tank mix fungicide treatments for control of Rhizoctonia blight in 'Pennlinks' creeping bentgrass. Clemson Univ. Turfgrass Progr. p. 40-43.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=53560
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 53560.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://web.archive.org/web/20020824165441/http://virtual.clemson.edu/groups/turfornamental/sctop/turfsec/plpanem/PlPaNem3/study01.htm
    Last checked: 07/18/2013
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b5345387
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)