| |
| Web URL(s): | http://web.archive.org/web/20060922002343/http://virtual.clemson.edu/groups/turfornamental/sctop/turfsec/plpanem/PlPaNem3/study07.htm
Last checked: 07/18/2013 |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Report |
|---|
| Author(s): | Martin, S. Bruce;
Jones, William |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Pee Dee Research and Education Center, Clemson University |
|---|
| Title: | Evaluation of Eagle, Fore and formulations of myclobutanil and mancozeb for control of Rhizoctonia blight in 'Penncross' creeping bentgrass |
|---|
| Section: | Plant pathology and nematology
Other records with the "Plant pathology and nematology" Section
Evaluation of experimental and standard fungicides for control of Rhizoctonia blights in creeping bentgrass
Other records with the "Evaluation of experimental and standard fungicides for control of Rhizoctonia blights in creeping bentgrass" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | Clemson University Turfgrass Program. 1997, p. 62-65. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | SC: Clemson University |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 4 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Disease control; Fungicide efficacy; Fungicide evaluation; Mancozeb; Myclobutanil; Rhizoctonia blight
|
|---|
| Cultivar Names: | Penncross |
|---|
| Trade Names: | Eagle; Fore |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "The objective was to compare Eagle (myclobutanil, a triazole SBI fungicide) and a formulation of myclobutanil and mancozeb (RH 0611) in comparison to Daconil, Fore and Heritage for control of Rhizoctonia blight in bentgrass....Eagle did not provide good disease control in this trial for Rhizoctonia blight. A formulation of myclobutanil and mancozeb provided better control. Heritage (a nonregistered experimental in development by Zeneca) was excellent, as was Daconil Ultrex at 3.8 oz on a 14 day schedule. Both of these treatments provided the best sustained disease control, particularly evident after sprays were terminated. Fore and Curalan provided good control, but did not provide residual control after sprays were terminated. Fore + Eagle did not provide adequate control, and surprisingly, the higher rate of Fore in combination with Eagle, did not improve control and even had less control than the lower rate of Fore. The reason for this difference is not known. Daconil Ultrex, Fore+Curalan provided good control of dollar spot, improving turf quality ratings. Fore alone and Heritage did not control dollar spot." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| Note: | "SB 671"
"Revised March 1997"
Tables |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Martin, S. B., and W. Jones. 1997. Evaluation of Eagle, Fore and formulations of myclobutanil and mancozeb for control of Rhizoctonia blight in 'Penncross' creeping bentgrass. Clemson Univ. Turfgrass Progr. p. 62-65. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=53565 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 53565. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
http://web.archive.org/web/20060922002343/http://virtual.clemson.edu/groups/turfornamental/sctop/turfsec/plpanem/PlPaNem3/study07.htm
Last checked: 07/18/2013 |
| 
MSU catalog number: b5345387 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
