Full TGIF Record # 55235
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://listings.lib.msu.edu/newsl/1998jun.pdf#page=4
    Last checked: 01/16/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
https://d.lib.msu.edu/newsl/790/OBJ/view#page=4
    Last checked: 11/28/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Publication Type:
i
Newsletter
Author(s):Wick, Robert L.; Nissenbaum, Truth
Author Affiliation:Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts
Title:1997 turfgrass nematode studies: Part IV & V
Source:The Newsletter [New England]. June 1998, p. 4, 8.
Publishing Information:Weston, MA: The Golf Course Superintendents Association of New England
# of Pages:2
Series:[1997 Turfgrass nematode studies
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Plant parasitic nematodes; Nematode control; Fenamiphos; Hoplolaimus; Macroposthonia; Tylenchorhynchus; Golf greens
Abstract/Contents:Presents results of two studies on managing nematodes in turf. Each study was conducted on a different putting green. For each green, "Some 25 plots, 6'x6', provided five replications for five treatments." The first study tested the use of DiTera which was injected into the turf using a Rogers Root Zone Injector. Three treatments of DiTera were applied at different rates to three different sets of five plots. One treatment of Nemacur was applied to another set of plots, and the last set of five plots was left untreated as controls. Samples were taken from the plots and analyzed. The results showed that the treatments did not give a long term reduction in nematodes compared to the control, and in some cases, the nematode population was higher in the DiTera injections than in the control. The second study tested the effect of Neo-Trol on nematode populations. Neo-Trol was sprinkled on the plots at the labeled rate and followed by five successive applications. Nemacur was applied once to five plots, and the remaining five plots served as controls. Samples were collected at various times and analyzed. Nemacur and Neo-Trol suppressed ring nematode populations in the August collections. Neither Nemacur nor Neo-Trol had any effect on suppressing cyst, lance or stunt nematode populations.
Language:English
References:0
See Also:See also Part 1 "1997 turfgrass nematode studies: Part I", The Newsletter, May 1998, p. 4 R=158593 R=158593

See also Part 2 "1997 turfgrass nematode studies: Part II", The Newsletter, May 1998, p. 4 R=55243 R=55243

See also Part 3 "1997 turfgrass nematode studies: Part III", The Newsletter, May 1998, p. 5 R=55244 R=55244

See also Part 6 "1997 turfgrass nematode studies: Part VI", The Newsletter, July 1998, p. 4 R=55239 R=55239
Note:Figures
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Wick, R. L., and T. Nissenbaum. 1998. 1997 turfgrass nematode studies: Part IV & V. Newsl. p. 4, 8.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=55235
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 55235.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://listings.lib.msu.edu/newsl/1998jun.pdf#page=4
    Last checked: 01/16/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
https://d.lib.msu.edu/newsl/790/OBJ/view#page=4
    Last checked: 11/28/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 433.16 .N38 G74
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)