Full TGIF Record # 57257
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/pdfs/28/1/JEQ0280010187
    Last checked: 12/12/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):King, K. W.; Balogh, J. C.
Title:Modeling evaluation of alternative management practices and reclaimed water for turfgrass systems
Source:Journal of Environmental Quality. Vol. 28, No. 1, January/February 1999, p. 187-193.
Publishing Information:Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
# of Pages:7
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Effluent water; Best management practices; Water quality; Golf greens; Golf fairways; Models; Nitrates; Fenamiphos; MSMA; Leaching
Abstract/Contents:"The use of reclaimed water for turfgrass irrigation is being implemented to conserve potable water supplies. Reclaimed water coupled with alternative management strategies may reduce offsite loadings of fertilizers and pesticides. The Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) water quality model was used to evaluate alternative management practices and reclaimed water for a southern turfgrass system. One green and fairway were modeled for a 65-yr period of climatic record with four treatments. Specifically, the treatments were normal water normal management (NWNM), normal water reduced management (NWRM), reclaimed water normal management (RWNM), and reclaimed water reduced management (RWRM). Surface and subsurface nitrate (NO₃-N), fenamiphos (ethyl 3-methyl-4-(methylthio)phenyl (1-methylethyl) phosphoramidate), and MSMA (monosodium methanearsenate) losses were evaluated. Significant differences were predicted in NO₃-N runoff and leachate losses from green management. Mean annual NO₃-N losses from runoff were 2.85 kg ha ⁻¹ (NWNM) and 2.05 kg ha ⁻¹ (RWRM). Significant reductions in mean annual surface and subsurface NO^D3]-N losses from fairway conditions were simulated when comparing NWNM (5.11 kg ha ⁻¹ surface; 1.68 kg ha ⁻¹ subsurface) to RWRM (2.69 kg ha ⁻¹ surface; 0.90 kg ha ⁻¹ subsurface). The cited differences in NO₃-N losses in runoff and leachate from green and fairway conditions were attributed primarily to irrigation strategies and excess rainfall. Predicted average annual pesticide recovery in runoff and leachate was <0.01% of applied and no significant differences were predicted with respect to treatments. This modeling strategy provides valuable insight into the relative efficacy of implementing reduced management practices for turfgrass systems."
Language:English
References:23
See Also:Other items relating to: Effluent Water Use

Other items relating to: M S M A
Note:Figures
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
King, K. W., and J. C. Balogh. 1999. Modeling evaluation of alternative management practices and reclaimed water for turfgrass systems. J. Environ. Qual. 28(1):p. 187-193.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=57257
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 57257.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/pdfs/28/1/JEQ0280010187
    Last checked: 12/12/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: S 900 .J6
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)