| |
Web URL(s): | http://www.jswconline.org/content/55/1/43.full.pdf+html Last checked: 10/01/2008 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website http://www.jswconline.org/content/55/1/43.full.pdf Last checked: 08/13/2013 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
Publication Type:
| Professional |
Author(s): | Herzog, M.;
Harbor, J.;
McClintock, K.;
Law, J.;
Bennett, K. |
Author Affiliation: | [Herzog and Harbor: Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; Bennett: Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana;] McClintock: Geauga Soil and Water Conservation District, Burton, Ohio; Law: Indiana Department of Natural Resources, and Saint Joseph Soil and Water Conservation District, South Bend, Indiana |
Title: | Are green lots worth more than brown lots? An economic incentive for erosion control on residential developments |
Section: | Research Other records with the "Research" Section
|
Source: | Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol. 55, No. 1, 2000, p. 43-49. |
Publishing Information: | Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society |
# of Pages: | 6 |
Related Web URL: | http://www.jswconline.org/content/55/1/43.abstract Last checked: 08/13/2013 Notes: Abstract only |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Erosion; Erosion control; Construction; Environmental effects; Economic impacts; Sedimentation; Federal legislation; State legislation
|
Abstract/Contents: | "Construction sites are major contributions to nonpoint source (NPS) pollution. However, a lack of personnel to enforce erosion control regulations and limited voluntary compliance means that few developers apply effective erosion control. New approaches are needed to increase erosion control on construction sites if this source of NPS pollution is to be significantly reduced. This study tests whether an economic advantage exists for developers who use vegetative cover for erosion control, independent of advantages gained in addressing environmental or regulatory concerns. Improving residential lot appearance from muddy brown to green grass may increase the appeal of the lot to buyers. A market survey shows that homwbuyers and realtors perceive vegetated lots to be worth more than unvegetated lots, and this increased value exceeds the cost of seeding. Thus, developers can now be encouraged to invest in vegetative cover because of the potentially high return on the investment." |
Language: | English |
References: | 9 |
Note: | Pictures, b/w Tables Graphs |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): Herzog, M., J. Harbor, K. McClintock, J. Law, and K. Bennett. 2000. Are green lots worth more than brown lots? An economic incentive for erosion control on residential developments. J. Soil Water Conserv. 55(1):p. 43-49. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=63842 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 63842. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| Web URL(s): http://www.jswconline.org/content/55/1/43.full.pdf+html Last checked: 10/01/2008 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website http://www.jswconline.org/content/55/1/43.full.pdf Last checked: 08/13/2013 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| MSU catalog number: S 622 .J65 |
| Find from within TIC: Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |