Full TGIF Record # 69219
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/aj/pdfs/92/5/974
    Last checked: 12/14/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/aj/articles/92/5/974
    Last checked: 12/14/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Riesterer, Janet L.; Casler, Michael D.; Undersander, Daniel J.; Combs, David K.
Author Affiliation:Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Title:Seasonal yield distribution of cool-season grasses following winter defoliation
Section:Forages
Other records with the "Forages" Section
Source:Agronomy Journal. Vol. 92, No. 5, September/October 2000, p. 974-980.
Publishing Information:Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy
# of Pages:7
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Forage; Seasonal variation; Cool season turfgrasses; Winter; Defoliation; Nitrogen fertilization; Dactylis glomerata; Elymus repens; Phalaris arundinacea; Bromus inermis; Festuca arundinacea; Phleum pratense; Fertilization program; Percent living ground cover; Fertilization rates; Fertilization timing; Grazing
Abstract/Contents:"Graziers in southeastern USA often stockpile forage in late summer to extend the grazing season and reduce feeding costs. The effect of winter grazing on the following growing seasons production in the upper Midwest has not been reported. This study was conducted to determine the consquential forage yield and persistence of several cool-season grasses following various winter defoliation and N fertilization treatments in the upper Midwest. Grass cultivars included early and late-maturing orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), quackgrass [Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski], reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.), smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), and timothy (Phleum pratense L.). October, December, or March defoliation generally did not affect seasonal forage yield except when early spring growth preceded March defoliation, reducing first-cut forage yields. Without N, timothy, reed canarygrass, and orchardgrass had the highest seasonal forage yields. Both orchardgrass varieties, tall fescue, and reed canarygrass had the greatest response to N whereas timothy had the lowest response. While both spring-applied N treatments (single and split application of 101 kg ha⁻¹) had carryover effects into the midsummer cuttings, the single N application resulted in higher seasonal forage yield than the split-N application. Tall fescue had the greatest carryover response to N in both years. Orchardgrass and reed canarygrass provided the highest forage yields throughout the season. Tall fescue and both orchardgrass varieties were most persistent and timothy, smooth bromegrass, and quakgrass were least persistent."
Language:English
References:25
Note:Figures
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Riesterer, J. L., M. D. Casler, D. J. Undersander, and D. K. Combs. 2000. Seasonal yield distribution of cool-season grasses following winter defoliation. Agron. J. 92(5):p. 974-980.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=69219
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 69219.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/aj/pdfs/92/5/974
    Last checked: 12/14/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/aj/articles/92/5/974
    Last checked: 12/14/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: S 22 .A45
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)