Full TGIF Record # 70022
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://academic.oup.com/amt/article/25/1/G16/110962/COMPARISON-OF-THREE-FORMULATIONS-OF-BEAUVERIA
    Last checked: 02/17/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
    Notes: Guide Page
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Xia, Y.; Brandenburg, R. L.; Hertl, P. T.
Author Affiliation:Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Title:Comparison of three formulations of Beauveria Bassiana for the control of mole crickets on golf course fairways, 1999
Source:Arthropod Management Tests. Vol. 25, 2000, p. 356.
Publishing Information:Annapolis, MD: Entomological Society of America
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Mole cricket control; Insecticide evaluation; Application rates; Pest density; Biological control; Golf fairways; Cynodon dactylon; Scapteriscus vicinus; Formulations; Beauveria bassiana; Combination treatments; Deltamethrin; Insecticides; Insect control
Abstract/Contents:"The objective of this study was to compare surface and subsurface applications of three formulations of Beauveria bassiana (B.b.) for mole cricket control. The study was conducted at the Meadowlands Golf Club in Brunswick Co, NC. CRBD was used and each treatment was replicated four times. Each block consisted of four plots, 3.7 x 12 m. A Toro Subsurface Liquid Injector® (The Toro Co.) was used for subsurface applications. Equipment ground speed was 9.7 kmph delivering a volume of 1400 liters/ha under a pressure of 11 kg/cm². Surface applications were applied using a CO₂ powered back-packed sprayer at an appication volume of 284 liter / ha. Deltamethrin granular was applied using a Scotts® (The Scotts Co.) hand spreader. All treatments were applied to moist soil on 7 Oct and soil at test site was very moist for the duration of the test. Air and soil temperatures at the time of application were 26.7 and 21.1°C, respectively. The mole cricket damage rating system (Cobb and Mack 1989) was used to evaluate control. Damage was rated on a 0-9 scale based on the occurrence of fresh surface damage on nine subgrids of the frame where 0 indicates no damage and 9 indicates severe damage. All mole cricket damage rating data were transformed (square root of X+0.5) prior to conducting ANOVA. Data were subjected to covariance analysis. Tukey's Studentized Range Test (a=0.05) was used to test differences between treatments. Subsurface application of B.b. did not provide significantly better mole cricket control than that of corresponding surface application. Deltamethrin and the subsurface-applied BI7S were the only treatments having statistically less damage than the untreated check at 17 DAT. No difference was foud between the treatments at 31 DAT."
Language:English
References:0
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Xia, Y., R. L. Brandenburg, and P. T. Hertl. 2000. Comparison of three formulations of Beauveria Bassiana for the control of mole crickets on golf course fairways, 1999. Arthropod Manage. Tests. 25:p. 356.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=70022
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 70022.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://academic.oup.com/amt/article/25/1/G16/110962/COMPARISON-OF-THREE-FORMULATIONS-OF-BEAUVERIA
    Last checked: 02/17/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
    Notes: Guide Page
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 951 .A1 I48
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)