| |
| Web URL(s): | https://academic.oup.com/amt/article/25/1/G69/111748/COMPARISON-OF-INJECTION-VERSUS-BROADCAST
Last checked: 02/23/2017
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Notes: Guide Page |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Report |
|---|
| Author(s): | Swier, Stanley R.;
Rollins, Alan;
Patrick, Gretchen;
Cady, Arthur |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Department of Plant Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH |
|---|
| Title: | Comparison of injection versus broadcast application of Scimitar and Dursban on ants, 1999 |
|---|
| Section: | Reports: Ornamentals
Other records with the "Reports: Ornamentals" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | Arthropod Management Tests. Vol. 25, 2000, p. 392. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Annapolis, MD: Entomological Society of America |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 1 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Insect control; Application methods; Insecticide evaluation; Pest density; Application rates; Lolium perenne; Festuca rubra subsp. rubra; Festuca arundinacea; Trifolium repens; Lasius neoniger; Comparisons; Injection methods; Broadcast treatment; Lambda-cyhalothrin; Chlorpyrifos; Ant control; Insecticides
|
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "This trial was conducted on a hay field in Holderness, NH. All treatments were applied on 22 Jun, replicated six times, to 120-ft² plots separated by a one-ft buffer. The layout was a RCB design. The injected treatments were applied using a Roger's Root Zone Injector. Each treatment was injected approximately 4 inches below the surface at 4200 psi; the injection nozzles were set 3 inches apart. Broadcast treatments were applied using a 7-ft boom on a 2-wheel, bicycle-type Co₂ sprayer, delivered at 40 psi. the boom was equipped with four 8005 fan-type nozzles, fitted with 50-mesh screens. The volume of water and insecticide mix for both application methods was 9 gal/1000 ft². None of the treatments were irrigated. The weather conditions at time of application were as follows: sky, sunny; wind, calm; air temp, 82°F. The soil conditions were as follows: surface temp, 79.3°F at 1-inch depth, 77.2°F; at 2-inch depth, 74.3°F; soil texture, sandy loam; sand, 61%; silt, 33%; clay, 6%; thatch, less than 0.06-inch; organic matter, 5.0%; moisture, 9.9%; pH, 6.5. Each plot was rated for active ant mounds 6 DAT, and every 7 d thereafter, for six weeks. For Scimitar, the injection application tended to improve control over the broadcast treatment, but the difference was significant at only 20DAT. For Dursban, injection and broadcast treatments provided similar control. Dursban provided significantly better control than Scimitar. No phytotoxicity was observed." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| Note: | Tables |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Swier, S. R., A. Rollins, G. Patrick, and A. Cady. 2000. Comparison of injection versus broadcast application of Scimitar and Dursban on ants, 1999. Arthropod Manage. Tests. 25:p. 392. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=70413 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 70413. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
https://academic.oup.com/amt/article/25/1/G69/111748/COMPARISON-OF-INJECTION-VERSUS-BROADCAST
Last checked: 02/23/2017
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Notes: Guide Page |
| 
MSU catalog number: SB 951 .A1 I48 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
