Full TGIF Record # 71171
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01904160009382029
    Last checked: 10/13/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Pitman, W. D.; Redfearn, D. D.; Read, J. C.
Author Affiliation:Pitman: Rosepine Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Rosepine, LA; Redfearn: Southeast Reseach Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Franklinton, LA; and Read: Texas A&M University Research and Extension Center, Dallas, TX
Title:Response of Texas bluegrass to season of nitrogen fertilization on the Louisiana coastal plain
Source:Journal of Plant Nutrition. Vol. 23, No. 4, 2000, p. 423-429.
Publishing Information:New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
# of Pages:7
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Poa arachnifera; Nitrogen fertilization; Fertilization; Nitrogen; Seasonal variation; Forage; Quality; Fertilization timing; Growth; Fertilization rates; Digestibility; Dry weight; Regrowth; Growth stages; Proteins; Clipping weight; Morphology
Geographic Terms:Louisiana Coastal Plain
Abstract/Contents:"Texas bluegrass (Poa arachnifera Torr.) has shown potential for use as a cool-season perennial pasture grass in the southern Great Plains, where it occurs as a natural component of rangeland plant communities, and into the western Coastal Plain. Responsiveness of this grass to nitrogen (N) fertilization appeared to be limited to the spring growing period in initial evaluations in Louisiana. A field plot experiment was conducted to assess forage production and quality responses to season of N fertilization on the Syn-1 population of Texas bluegrass. Winter forage production responses to 50 kg N ha⁻1 were obtained in the 1997-98 growing season but not in 1998-99 after stands had been depleted by summer drought. Greatest yield increases resulted from spring N application, however, fall plus winter fertilization provided the most uniform distribution of forage through the cool season. Forage fiber fractions, in vitro digestibility, and crude protein were not affected by N fertilization. Both amount and distribution of Texas bluegrass forage, but not forage quality, can be manipulated by time of N fertilization."
Language:English
References:9
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Pitman, W. D., D. D. Redfearn, and J. C. Read. 2000. Response of Texas bluegrass to season of nitrogen fertilization on the Louisiana coastal plain. J. Plant Nutr. 23(4):p. 423-429.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=71171
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 71171.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01904160009382029
    Last checked: 10/13/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: QK 867 .J67
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)