Full TGIF Record # 73114
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH.11.2.302
Web URL(s):https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/11/2/article-p302.xml?rskey=cNNdlw
    Last checked: 11/15/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Ries, Stanley; Baughan, Rebecca; Muraleedharan, Nair G.; Schutzki, Robert
Author Affiliation:Ries: Professor; Baughan: Research assistant; Nair: Professor; and Schutzki: Associate professor, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Title:Repelling animals from crops using plant extracts
Section:Technology and product reports
Other records with the "Technology and product reports" Section
Source:HortTechnology. Vol. 11, No. 2, April-June 2001, p. 302-307.
Publishing Information:Alexandria, VA: American Society for Horticultural Science
# of Pages:6
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Animal pests; Animal repellents; Plant extracts; Feeding preferences
Trade Names:Bobbex; Deer Away; Get Away; Deer-Off; Foggy Mountain Coyote Urine; Hinder; Hot Pepper Wax; Hot Sauce; Ro-pel; Tree Guard; XP-20
Abstract/Contents:"Several plant species that are not consumed by animals were collected, extracted with organic solvents, and tested at different venues for their effectiveness as animal feeding repellents. Species with the most repellent activity were daffodil (Narcissus pseudo narcissus), bearded iris (Iris sp.), hot pepper (Capsicum frutescens), catnip (Nepeta cataria) and peppermint (Mentha piperita). Considerable effort was expended to isolate and identify compounds from these species responsible for repellent activity. Eight chemicals have been isolated and identify compounds from these species responsible for repellent activity. Eight chemicals have been isolated and purified, and four of them have been identified. Both daffodil and catnip contain more than one repellent, but none of the four compounds identified were common to both species. Combinations of extracts from more than one plant species proved to have more repellent activity than extracts from individual species used alone. In several tests these plant extracts proved to be as effective or better than available commercial repellents. A plethora of additives and surfactants were tested to increase repellent activity by enhancing the spreading, penetration or persistence of the extracts."
Language:English
References:14
Note:Figures
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Ries, S., R. Baughan, N. G. Muraleedharan, and R. Schutzki. 2001. Repelling animals from crops using plant extracts. HortTechnology. 11(2):p. 302-307.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=73114
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 73114.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.21273/HORTTECH.11.2.302
Web URL(s):
https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/11/2/article-p302.xml?rskey=cNNdlw
    Last checked: 11/15/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 317.5 .H6
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)