Full TGIF Record # 73297
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.jswconline.org/content/54/4/657.full.pdf+html
    Last checked: 10/01/2008
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.jswconline.org/content/54/4/657.full.pdf
    Last checked: 08/13/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Professional
Author(s):McQuaid, B. F.; Norfleet, L.
Author Affiliation:McQuaid: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Watershed Science Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina; and Norfleet: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation, Service Soil Quality Institute, Auburn University, Auburn, Illinois
Title:Assessment of two Carolina watersheds using land and stream habitat quality indices
Source:Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol. 54, No. 4, Fourth Quarter 1999, p. 657-665.
Publishing Information:Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society
# of Pages:9
Related Web URL:http://www.jswconline.org/content/54/4/657.abstract
    Last checked: 08/13/2013
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Assessment; Watersheds; Habitats; Indices
Abstract/Contents:"The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has been directed to assist local landowners and communities to implement watershed improvement practices. The purpose of this study was to document current conditions in the Rocky River Watershed in North Carolina and the Saluda River Watershed in South Carolina. A variety of watershed assessment tools, including the NRCS Visual Stream Assessment (VSA), Stream Habitat Assessment (SHA), Riparian Vegetation Index (RVI), Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI), and Land Quality Index (LQI) were used on a statistically representative portion of both watersheds. Overall, the SHA, VSA, and RVI rated the watersheds' condition as good, whereas the IBI rated them as fair. Correlations between IBI and the other indices were poor, perhaps indicating these indices measure different features within the watershed. The LQI emphasized the need for better characterization of urban land and riparian corridors. Inclusion of suburban lawns with the urban land indicator improved correlations between IBI and LQI by 20%. This pilot study suggests further scrutiny in applying quantitative stream physical habitat measures to assess watershed conditions. It also indicates additional study of the IBI by NRCS. Resources devoted to statistical design were valuable and should provide the NRCS with a framework for conducting future watershed studies."
Language:English
References:23
Note:Pictures, color & b/w
Tables
Graphs
Includes map, "Eligible and sampled (darker) sub-drainge areas in the Rocky River Watershed, North Carolina.
Includes map, "Eligible and sampled (darker) sub-drainge areas in Saluda River Watershed, South Caroline
Includes map, "Land quality point samples and sub-drainage areas for a portion of the Saluda River Watershed"
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
McQuaid, B. F., and L. Norfleet. 1999. Assessment of two Carolina watersheds using land and stream habitat quality indices. J. Soil Water Conserv. 54(4):p. 657-665.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=73297
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 73297.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.jswconline.org/content/54/4/657.full.pdf+html
    Last checked: 10/01/2008
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.jswconline.org/content/54/4/657.full.pdf
    Last checked: 08/13/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: S 622 .J65
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)