Full TGIF Record # 73516
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.21273/HORTSCI.34.3.553A
Web URL(s):https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/34/3/article-p553A.xml?rskey=6UYGrA
    Last checked: 11/15/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file; Abstract only
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Meyer, Mary Hockenberry; Carpenter, Perrin
Author Affiliation:University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
Title:Consumers knowledge, practices, and environmental attitudes on lawn care
Section:Woody ornamentals/landscape/turf: Crop production
Other records with the "Woody ornamentals/landscape/turf: Crop production" Section
Meeting Info.:96th Annual International Conference of the American Society of Horticultural Science
Source:HortScience. Vol. 34, No. 3, June 1999, p. 553.
Publishing Information:Alexandria, VA: American Society for Horticultural Science
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Lawn turf; Perceptions; Questionnaire surveys; Clippings; Fertilization; Weed control; Environment; Pesticides
Abstract/Contents:"Homeowner surveys conducted in Edine, Minn., showed varying levels of horticultural knowledge on lawn care. A majority of consumers, 75%, knew the value of lawn clippings was equivalent to one fertiliation treatment, but 72% did not know the amount of fertilizer needed for a medium maintenance lawn. A total of 77% indicated spring as the single best time to control broadleaf weeds, and 39% thought spring was the best time to fertilize, whereas 48% indicating fall as the best time to fertilize. Current practices include the following: leaving clippins on the lawn, 75%; bagged and removed clippings, 16%; 83% apply fertilizer in the spring; 67% fertilize in the fall; 61% apply herbicides; 74% mow weekly; 51% mow at 2-3", but 27% mow at 1-2". Environmental attitudes were rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 1 being strongly agree and 4 being strongly disagree. Consumers stongly agreed that pesticide (1.5) and fertilizer (1.7) applications should be posted in public areas. The statement "A well kept lawn increases property values" also found strong agreement, (1.6). Consumers disagreed that pesticides are not harmful to the environment (3.3) and public health (3.3); while fertilizers were only slightly less harmful to the environment (3.0) and public health (2.9). A 10% weed population was acceptable (2.2) but 25% was not (3.3). Areas for consumer education exist in the time and amount of fertilizer, time of weed control, and mowing height. Because of negative attitude toward pesticides and fertilizers, recommendations for medium to low input grasses should be well received."
Language:English
References:0
Note:This item is an abstract only!
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Meyer, M. H., and P. Carpenter. 1999. Consumers knowledge, practices, and environmental attitudes on lawn care. HortScience. 34(3):p. 553.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=73516
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 73516.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.34.3.553A
Web URL(s):
https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/34/3/article-p553A.xml?rskey=6UYGrA
    Last checked: 11/15/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file; Abstract only
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 1 .H64
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)