Full TGIF Record # 73520
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.21273/HORTSCI.32.3.521A
Web URL(s):https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/32/3/article-p521A.xml?rskey=bWcQLx
    Last checked: 11/15/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file; Abstract only
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Miwa, Takashi; Kihara, Hisakazu; Tonogi, Hideaki
Author Affiliation:Miwa: Research and Development Institute, Takenaka Corporation, Japan; Kihara, Tonogi: Turf Research and Technology Support, Turf Business Division, Nichino Ryokka Co., Ltd., Japan
Title:The methodological study of under-soil heating system (USHS) for warm-season grass
Section:Woody ornamentals/landscape/turf: Crop production
Other records with the "Woody ornamentals/landscape/turf: Crop production" Section
Meeting Info.:96th Annual International Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Minneapolis, MN: July 27-31, 1999
Source:HortScience. Vol. 34, No. 3, June 1999, p. 553.
Publishing Information:Alexandria, VA: American Society for Horticultural Science
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Soil warming systems; Warm season turfgrasses; Transitional overseeding; Winter
Abstract/Contents:"Recently, full-green turf on sports fields in the winter is highly desirable. The negative factor for warm-season grass pitch is its winter dormancy. Winter overseeding (WOS) is one successful method to make turf seem green. However, maintenance cost for WOS turf is relatively expensive and brings some difficulties. Undersoil heating (USH) has been used for cool-season grass pitch of warm-season grass pitch to make turf green in winter. Our objectives were 1) to confirm USH effectiveness for warm-season grass, 2) to make the specified system itself, and 3) to estimate the approximate heat demand. The results indicate that USH can make warm-season grass green and maintain much higher turf quality even in severe winter conditions. Weed invasion, pests, and diseases levels are quite low during the test period. The characteristics needed to create the system include heating pipe spacing and depth, initial media temperature, and required soil temperature. In addition, USH needs a plastic cover for insulation that is light and that air and water can penetrate. Compared with WOS, USH can reduce maintenance fees and procedures, such as preparation for WOS in a fall and transition into spring. Thus, UHS can prolong total playing period. Moreover, it is easy to maintain the higher turf quality and lower maintenance cost than WOS. In the future, we should concentrate on creating more concrete maintenance program for this method."
Language:English
References:0
See Also:Other items relating to: TROVER
Note:This item is an abstract only!
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Miwa, T., H. Kihara, and H. Tonogi. 1999. The methodological study of under-soil heating system (USHS) for warm-season grass. HortScience. 34(3):p. 553.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=73520
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 73520.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.32.3.521A
Web URL(s):
https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/32/3/article-p521A.xml?rskey=bWcQLx
    Last checked: 11/15/2019
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file; Abstract only
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 1 .H64
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)