| |
Web URL(s): | http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.full.pdf+html Last checked: 10/01/2008 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.full.pdf Last checked: 08/13/2013 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
Publication Type:
| Professional |
Author(s): | Arndt, C.;
Fecso, B.;
Preckel, P. V.;
Stoneman, B. |
Author Affiliation: | Arndt: Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN; Fecso: Program Analyist Conservation Operations Division, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, D.C.; Preckel: Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN: Stoneman; Assistant Virginia State Soil Scientist, National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Richmond, VA |
Title: | Soil selection for use in environmental analysis |
Section: | Research Other records with the "Research" Section
|
Source: | Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol. 56, No. 2, Second Quarter 2001, p. 165-171. |
Publishing Information: | Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society |
# of Pages: | 7 |
Related Web URL: | http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.abstract Last checked: 08/13/2013 Notes: Abstract only |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Erosion; Methodology; Comparisons; Soil sampling; Sampling
|
Abstract/Contents: | "Estimating variables, such as erosion rates, across a diverse soil and water resource base is a problem of interest in natural resource management. Here, we propose an alternative to the predominant soils (PS) approach of Stoneman, Brown, and Spivey. Our method, called Gaussian quadrature (GQ), is adapted from the numerical integration literature. Two experiments compare GQ with PS. The first plugs sample input into a simulation model to approximate erosion rates, surface runoff, and crop yield for a region. The second estimates erosion in three regions using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). Results from the GQ samples are compared to results for the full population and results from random samples. GQ sampling tends to be more effective, particularly with respect to measures related to the heterogeneity of the population, such as the variance and skewness, than PS or random sampling. Judiciously used, GQ sample selection permits reductions in the number of soils sampled with only a moderate loss of accuracy." |
Language: | English |
References: | 18 |
Note: | Tables |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): Arndt, C., B. Fecso, P. V. Preckel, and B. Stoneman. 2001. Soil selection for use in environmental analysis. J. Soil Water Conserv. 56(2):p. 165-171. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=73676 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 73676. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| Web URL(s): http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.full.pdf+html Last checked: 10/01/2008 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.full.pdf Last checked: 08/13/2013 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| MSU catalog number: S 622 .J65 |
| Find from within TIC: Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |