Full TGIF Record # 73676
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.full.pdf+html
    Last checked: 10/01/2008
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.full.pdf
    Last checked: 08/13/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Professional
Author(s):Arndt, C.; Fecso, B.; Preckel, P. V.; Stoneman, B.
Author Affiliation:Arndt: Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN; Fecso: Program Analyist Conservation Operations Division, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, D.C.; Preckel: Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN: Stoneman; Assistant Virginia State Soil Scientist, National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Richmond, VA
Title:Soil selection for use in environmental analysis
Section:Research
Other records with the "Research" Section
Source:Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol. 56, No. 2, Second Quarter 2001, p. 165-171.
Publishing Information:Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society
# of Pages:7
Related Web URL:http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.abstract
    Last checked: 08/13/2013
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Erosion; Methodology; Comparisons; Soil sampling; Sampling
Abstract/Contents:"Estimating variables, such as erosion rates, across a diverse soil and water resource base is a problem of interest in natural resource management. Here, we propose an alternative to the predominant soils (PS) approach of Stoneman, Brown, and Spivey. Our method, called Gaussian quadrature (GQ), is adapted from the numerical integration literature. Two experiments compare GQ with PS. The first plugs sample input into a simulation model to approximate erosion rates, surface runoff, and crop yield for a region. The second estimates erosion in three regions using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). Results from the GQ samples are compared to results for the full population and results from random samples. GQ sampling tends to be more effective, particularly with respect to measures related to the heterogeneity of the population, such as the variance and skewness, than PS or random sampling. Judiciously used, GQ sample selection permits reductions in the number of soils sampled with only a moderate loss of accuracy."
Language:English
References:18
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Arndt, C., B. Fecso, P. V. Preckel, and B. Stoneman. 2001. Soil selection for use in environmental analysis. J. Soil Water Conserv. 56(2):p. 165-171.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=73676
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 73676.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.full.pdf+html
    Last checked: 10/01/2008
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.jswconline.org/content/56/2/165.full.pdf
    Last checked: 08/13/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: S 622 .J65
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)