Full TGIF Record # 74233
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/its/articles/2001jou604.pdf
    Last checked: 09/29/2008
    Requires: PDF Reader
Access Restriction:Certain MSU-hosted archive URLs may be restricted to legacy database members.
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Nikolai, T. A.; Rieke, P. E.; Rogers, J. N. III; Vargas, J. M. Jr.
Author Affiliation:Nikolai, Rieke, Rogers: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI; Vargas: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Title:Turfgrass and soil responses to lightweight rolling on putting green root zone mixes
Section:Soil physics
Other records with the "Soil physics" Section
Meeting Info.:Toronto, Ontario, Canada: July 2001
Source:International Turfgrass Society Research Journal. Vol. 9, No. Part 2, 2001, p. 604-609.
Publishing Information:Oakville, Ontario, Canada: International Turfgrass Society
# of Pages:6
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Golf courses; Rolling; Golf greens; Root zone mixture; Golf green speed; Sclerotinia homoeocarpa; Moss control; Bird control; Agrotis ipsilon
Abstract/Contents:"In 1995 a lightweight green rolling study was initiated on greens constructed with three different root zone mixes: 1) an 85% sand, 15% peat (v/v) green built to USGA specifications; 2) an 80% sand, 10% peat, 10% soil green built with a gravel layer; and 3) a non-disturbed native soil green (sandy clay loam). There were three replications of each soil type. Treatments included rolling three times per week following early morning mowing, and non-rolled plots. Root zone mix had minimal effect on ball roll distance. Rolled greens increased green speed by approximately 11% on the day of treatment and 6% the day after rolling, compared with non-rolled greens. This suggests that rolling three times per week can significantly increase green speeds six days per week. Lightweight green rolling may have some impact as a cultural management tool as rolled plots displayed reductions in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa, moss growth, and bird activity, the latter of which was related to black cutworm activity. No differences were found regarding turfgrass quality or soil bulk density."
Language:English
References:16
See Also:Other items relating to: ROLLGOLF
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Nikolai, T. A., P. E. Rieke, J. N. III Rogers, and J. M. Jr. Vargas. 2001. Turfgrass and soil responses to lightweight rolling on putting green root zone mixes. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 9(Part 2):p. 604-609.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=74233
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 74233.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/its/articles/2001jou604.pdf
    Last checked: 09/29/2008
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 433 .I52 v. 9
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)