Full TGIF Record # 77183
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.1889
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/pdfs/41/6/1889
    Last checked: 05/04/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/articles/41/6/1889
    Last checked: 05/04/20171/6/1889
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Erickson, J. E.; Cisar, J. L.; Volin, J. C.; Snyder, G. H.
Author Affiliation:Erickson: Forest Ecology and Management, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Cisar: Environmental Horticulture, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, Fort Lauderdale; Volin: Environmental Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Snyder: Soil and Water Science, Everglades Research and Education Center, Belle Glade, FL
Title:Comparing nitrogen runoff and leaching and between newly established St. Augustinegrass turf and an alternative residential landscape
Section:Turfgrass science
Other records with the "Turfgrass science" Section
Source:Crop Science. Vol. 41, No. 6, November 2001, p. 1889-1895.
Publishing Information:Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America
# of Pages:7
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/abstracts/41/6/1889
    Last checked: 05/04/2017
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Comparisons; Surface runoff; Nitrogen; Leaching; Stenotaphrum secundatum; Seed mixtures; Fertilization
Abstract/Contents:"Turfgrass landscapes have the potential for loss of applied N through both runoff and leaching. Lower maintenance alternative vegetation used in mixed-species landscapes may reduce N leaching and runoff, which is important for reducing N pollution of surface and ground waters. However, few studies have examined this paradigm. Therefore, we constructed a field-scale facility to compare fertilizer N runoff and leaching between St. Augustinegrass [Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze] and a mixed-species landscape. Four replications of each landscape were randomly assigned to 50-m2 plots. A medium-fine sand (75-cm depth) was used as the root zone mix. A blended granular fertilizer was applied at a rate of 300 and 150 kg N ha-1yr-1 on the turfgrass and mixed-species, respectively. Throughout the first year following installation of the landscapes, fertilizer N loss in surface runoff was insignificant. In contrast, N leaching losses were significantly greater on the mixed-species landscapes during three fertilizer cycles, resulting in 48.3 kg N ha-1 compared with 4.1 kg N ha-1 for the St. Augustinegrass annually. The results from the newly established landscapes presented here indicated that St. Augustinegrass was more efficient at using applied N and minimizing N leaching compared with the alternative landscape. Furthermore, the study identified areas of concern with respect to N management practices on alternative landscapes. These results hold implications for future landscape models and management of resources in a residential setting."
Language:English
References:26
Note:Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Erickson, J. E., J. L. Cisar, J. C. Volin, and G. H. Snyder. 2001. Comparing nitrogen runoff and leaching and between newly established St. Augustinegrass turf and an alternative residential landscape. Crop Sci. 41(6):p. 1889-1895.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=77183
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 77183.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2001.1889
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/pdfs/41/6/1889
    Last checked: 05/04/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/articles/41/6/1889
    Last checked: 05/04/20171/6/1889
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 183 .C7
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)