Full TGIF Record # 81309
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.bioone.org/bioone/?request=get-document&issn=0043-1745&volume=050&issue=04&page=0411
    Last checked: 03/29/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Wilkerson, Gail G.; Wiles, Lori J.; Bennett, Andrew C.
Author Affiliation:Wilkerson: Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina; Wiles: USGA-ARS-WMU, AERC, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado; Bennett: Everglades Research and Education Center, Belle Glade, Florida
Title:Weed management decision models: Pitfalls, perceptions, and possibilities of the economic threshold approach
Column Name:50th anniversary - invited article
Other records with the "50th anniversary - invited article" Column
Source:Weed Science. Vol. 50, No. 4, July/August 2002, p. 411-424.
Publishing Information:Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America
# of Pages:14
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Scouting; Threshold values; Economic impacts; Weed control; Decision-making; Models; Perceptions; Questionnaire surveys
Abstract/Contents:"The use of scouting and economic thresholds has not been accepted as readily for managing weeds as it has been for insects, but the economic threshold concept is the basis of most weed management decision models available to growers. A World Wide Web survey was conducted to investigate perceptions of weed science professors regarding the value of these models. Over half of the 56 respondents were involved in model development or support, and 82% thought that decision models could be beneficial for managing weeds, although more as educational rather than as decision-making tools. Some respondents indicated that models are too simple because they do not include all factors that influence weed competition or all issues a grower considers when deciding how to manage weeds. Others stated that models are too complex because many users do not have time to obtain and enter the required information or are not necessary because growers use a zero threshold or because skilled decision makers can make better and quicker recommendations. Our view is that economic threshold-based models are, and will continue to be, valuable as a means of providing growers with the knowledge and experience of many experts for field-specific decisions. Weed management decision models must be evaluated from three perspectives: biological accuracy, quality of recommendations, and ease of use. Scientists developing and supporting decision models may have hindered wide-scale acceptance by overemphasizing the capacity to determine economic thresholds, and they need to explain more clearly to potential users the tasks for which models are and are not suitable. Future use depends on finding cost-effective methods to assess weed populations, demonstrating that models use results in better decision making, and finding stable, long-term funding for maintenance and support. New technologies, including herbicide-resistant crops, will increase rather than decrease the need for decision support."
Language:English
References:107
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Wilkerson, G. G., L. J. Wiles, and A. C. Bennett. 2002. Weed management decision models: Pitfalls, perceptions, and possibilities of the economic threshold approach. Weed Sci. 50(4):p. 411-424.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=81309
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 81309.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.bioone.org/bioone/?request=get-document&issn=0043-1745&volume=050&issue=04&page=0411
    Last checked: 03/29/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 610 .W38
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)