| |
| Web URL(s): | https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2136/sssaj2002.1540
Last checked: 02/28/2024
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2136/sssaj2002.1540
Last checked: 02/28/2024
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Refereed |
|---|
| Author(s): | Laughlin, Ronald J.;
Stevens, R. James |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Agricultural and Environmental Science Division, Belfast, United Kingdom |
|---|
| Title: | Evidence for fungal dominance of denitrification and codenitrification in a grassland soil |
|---|
| Section: | Soil biology and biochemistry
Other records with the "Soil biology and biochemistry" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | Soil Science Society of America Journal. Vol. 66, No. 5, September/October 2002, p. 1540-1548. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 9 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Fungi; Denitrification; Streptomycin; Cycloheximide; Grassland soils; Soil microorganisms; Bacteria; Nitrates; Ammonia; Nitrogen dioxide
|
|---|
| Geographic Terms: | Northern Ireland |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Fungi are capable of nitrification and denitrification and often dominate the microbial biomass of temperate grassland soils. We determined the contributions of bacteria and fungi to N2O and N2 production in a grassland soil from Northern Ireland by combining the substrate-induced respiration inhibition method and the 15N gas-flux method. Streptomycin (C21H39N7O12) was used as the bacterial inhibitor and cycloheximide (C15H23NO4) as the fungal inhibitor. By labeling the NH4 and NO3 pools, we tested the hypothesis that fungi produce N2O and N2 solely by the reduction of NO3. Cycloheximide decreased the flux of N2O by 89% and streptomycin decreased the flux by 23%, indicating that fungi were responsible for most of the N2O production. All of the N2O was derived from NO3 reduction. Labeled N2 was only detected in control and streptomycin treatments. The distribution of the 15N atoms in the labeled N2 indicated that the source of the labeling was predominantly the NO3 pool, but that the process of formation was not dominated by denitrification. Codenitrification, where a 15N atom from labeled nitrogen dioxide (NO2) combines with a 14N atom from a natural abundance source, was proposed as the process forming labeled N2. About 92% of the labeled N2 was estimated to be due to codenitrification and 8% due to denitrification. The flux of N2O was always greater than the flux of N2, the mole fraction of N2O averaging 0.7. Fungal denitrification could be of ecological significance because N2O is the dominant gaseous end product." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 56 |
|---|
| Note: | Tables
Graphs |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Laughlin, R. J., and R. J. Stevens. 2002. Evidence for fungal dominance of denitrification and codenitrification in a grassland soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66(5):p. 1540-1548. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=82707 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 82707. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2136/sssaj2002.1540
Last checked: 02/28/2024
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2136/sssaj2002.1540
Last checked: 02/28/2024
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| 
MSU catalog number: S 590 .S65 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
