Full TGIF Record # 86287
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://www.dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/articles/43/3/943
    Last checked: 05/05/2017
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://www.dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/pdfs/41/3/943
    Last checked: 05/05/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Karcher, Douglas E.; Richardson, Michael D.
Author Affiliation:Department of Horticulture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas
Title:Quantifying turfgrass color using digital image analysis
Section:Turfgrass science
Other records with the "Turfgrass science" Section
Source:Crop Science. Vol. 43, No. 3, May/June 2003, p. 943-951.
Publishing Information:Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America
# of Pages:9
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Color; Software; Zoysia japonica; Agrostis stolonifera; Cynodon; Visual evaluation; Analytical methods
Trade Names:SigmaScan
Abstract/Contents:"Color is a major component of the aesthetic quality of turf and often evaluated in field studies. Digital image analysis may be an improved, objective method to quantify turf color. Studies were conducted to determine if digital image analysis with SigmaScan software (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was capable of: (i) accurately determining the hue, saturation, and brightness (HSB) levels of Munsell Plant Tissue color chips, (ii) quantifying visual color differences among zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.) and creeping bentgrass {Agrostis palustris Huds. [= A. stolonifera var. palustris (Huds.) Farw.]} plots receiving various N treatments, and (iii) quantifying genetic color differences among bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) cultivars. Digital images of turf plots were analyzed with SigmaScan software to determine average HSB levels for each image. A dark green color index (DGCI) was created from HSB values for direct comparison with visual ratings. Digital image analysis accurately quantified the HSB levels (r2 = 0.99, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively) of Munsell color chips corresponding to turf colors. Significant HSB differences were present among N treatments in creeping bentgrass, while only significant hue differences existed in zoysiagrass. Significant hue and saturation differences were present among bermudagrass cultivars. There was strong agreement between DGCI values and visual ratings. The relative variances of the HSB and DGCI were significantly less than the variance associated with multiple raters. This evaluation technique may facilitate objective comparisons of turf color across researchers, locations, and years when images are collected under equal lighting conditions (i.e., the use of an artificial light source at night or in an enclosed system)."
Language:English
References:22
Note:Reprint appears on Seed Research of Oregon website, May/June 2003, p. 1-9
Pictures, color
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Karcher, D. E., and M. D. Richardson. 2003. Quantifying turfgrass color using digital image analysis. Crop Sci. 43(3):p. 943-951.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=86287
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 86287.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://www.dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/articles/43/3/943
    Last checked: 05/05/2017
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://www.dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/pdfs/41/3/943
    Last checked: 05/05/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 183 .C7
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)