Full TGIF Record # 90703
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.newss.org/proceedings/proceedings_2003_vol57.pdf#page=115
    Last checked: 07/23/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Derr, J. F.
Author Affiliation:Virginia Tech, Virginia Beach, Virginia
Title:Common reed response to mowing
Section:Turfgrass and plant growth regulators
Other records with the "Turfgrass and plant growth regulators" Section
Meeting Info.:Hyatt Regency Hotel, Baltimore, MD: January 6-9, 2003
Source:Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the NortheasternWeed Science Society. Vol. 57, 2003, p. 115.
Publishing Information:Ithaca, NY: Northeastern Weed Science Society
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Biomass; Cultural control; Glyphosate; Herbicide efficacy; Herbicide evaluation; Mowing; Phragmites australis; Weed control
Abstract/Contents:"Common reed [Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.] has overtaken wetland areas across the northeast. Studies were conducted in containers and at two field sites to evaluate mowing, with or without herbicide application, for phragmites control. Certain plots were mowed every 2, 4 or 8 weeks. One set of plots received an application of glyphosate at 2% V/V. Glyphosate was also applied either two weeks prior to a single mowing or at 4 weeks after one mowing. Experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. In the container trials, phragmites was grown in 1- gallon pots of pine bark, with 3 pots per plot. Phragmites was 3 feet tall at initiation of the trial. At three months after study initiation, all treatments containing glyphosate gave complete control of phragmites. Phragmites shoot weight and shoot number decreased as mowing frequency increased. Cutting every 2 weeks gave excellent control of common reed. Cutting every 8 weeks did not provide acceptable control. In the field trials, phragmites was four to nine feet tall at study initiation. Plots were mowed with a weedeater fitted with a saw blade. Percent control and phragmites shoot count were recorded on September 4, 2001, 4 months after initiation of the trial. Phragmites shoots were counted and weighed in May of 2002, one year after trial initiation. In the field mowing trials, mowing every 2 weeks resulted in 90 to 95% control of giant reed in early September, with approximately 80% control seen with mowing every 4 weeks. Mowing every 8 weeks gave 70% control. For all mowing treatments, however viable phragmites stems were observed at the end of the growing season. When evaluated the following May. considerable regrowth was observed in mowed plots. Reduction in phragmites shoot weight in May ranged from 35 to 77% with the mowing treatments that did not receive a glyphosate application. When evaluated in early September, glyphosate applied in combination with a single mowing provided good to excellent control of phragmites. Applying glyphosate prior to mowing provided similiar control compared to applications made one month after mowing. Addition of mowing appeared to improve control over glyphosaate applied without mowing when evaluated in September. Glyphosate applied alone provided 75 to 88% control of common reed, while combining mowing with glyphosate resulted in 84 to 96% control, depending upon location, at this time. However, when evaluated in the following May, glyphosate applied alone appeared to give slightly greater control than when applied with mowing, although the results were not statistically different. Glyphosate applied without mowing gave 93 to 95% reduction in phragmites shoot weight the following may. Glyphosate applied in conjunction with mowing gave 87% to 93% reduction in phragmites shoot weight in May. Glyphosate, applied with without mowing, provides excellent but not complete phragmites control one year after a single application. Mowing frequently will suppress this weed. However, maintaining a regular mowing schedule for one growing season will not provide acceptable control of phragmites the following season."
Language:English
References:0
Note:This item is an abstract only!
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Derr, J. F. 2003. Common reed response to mowing. Proc. Annu. Meet. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:p. 115.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=90703
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 90703.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.newss.org/proceedings/proceedings_2003_vol57.pdf#page=115
    Last checked: 07/23/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 610 .N62 v. 57
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by file name: newss2003
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)