Full TGIF Record # 937
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.jstor.org/stable/4043483
    Last checked: 11/18/2013
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/4043483.pdf
    Last checked: 11/18/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Troutman, Barry C.; King, John W.; Frans, Robert E.
Author Affiliation:Troutman: Zone Agron., Chemlawn Corp., Columbus, OH; King: Assoc. Prof.; Frans: Prof., Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Title:Wild garlic (Allium vineale) control with glyphosate
Source:Weed Science. Vol. 29, No. 6, November 1981, p. 717-722.
Publishing Information:Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America
# of Pages:6
Related Web URL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4043483
    Last checked: 11/18/2013
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Allium vineale; Weed control; Glyphosate; Growth chambers; Toxicity; Herbicides; Absorption; Application rates; Injuries
Abstract/Contents:"Growth chamber studies and field trials were conducted to evaluate the toxicity of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] and certain other herbicides to wild garlic (Allium vineale L.). Toxicity to wild garlic increased with increasing rates up to 6 kg/ha. Glyphosate was more toxic to wild garlic when applied in spray volumes of 125 to 500 L/ha than in greater volumes. Addition of surfactant did not increase toxicity or absorption rates of 3 kg/ha of glyphosate, but did increase the advantage of 2 kg/ha of glyphosate over 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid]. When glyphosate was sprayed on wild garlic plants at 3 kg/ha, then washed off after 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 h, absorption of a biologically significant amount of glyphosate required 8 h, and toxicity increased through the 32-h exposure. Injury, which increased as mowing was delayed up to 12 days after application, indicated that significant quantities of glyphosate were translocated between 3 to 12 days after treatment in a field test. Glyphosate; 2,4-D; 2,4-D + mecoprop {2-[(4-chloro-o-tolyl)oxy] propionic acid} + dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid); and VEL-4207 [N-phenyldiethanolamine-bis-(2-methoxy-3, 6-dichlorobenzoate) applied in a sequence of either spring-fall-spring or fall-spring, were compared for wild garlic control. All herbicides tested controlled wild garlic, but glyphosate was more effective than 2,4-D after spring-fall-spring applications. All spring-fall-spring treatments except 2,4-D + mecoprop + dicamba significantly reduced the number and weight of hardshell bulbs present 8 weeks after the last treatment. The initial treatment in the spring-fall-spring sequence was necessary to reduce hardshell bulb populations the second spring. One year after treatment wild garlic reinfested all plots."
Language:English
References:11
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Troutman, B. C., J. W. King, and R. E. Frans. 1981. Wild garlic (Allium vineale) control with glyphosate. Weed Sci. 29(6):p. 717-722.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=937
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 937.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4043483
    Last checked: 11/18/2013
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/4043483.pdf
    Last checked: 11/18/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 610 .W38
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)