| |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.07.006 |
|---|
| Web URL(s): | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219416301624
Last checked: 07/21/2016
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Refereed |
|---|
| Author(s): | Ferguson, J. Connor;
Gaussoin, Roch E.;
Eastin, John A.;
Sousek, Matthew D.;
Kruger, Greg R. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Ferguson, Gaussoin, and Sousek: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln; Kruger: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte; Eastin: Kamterter LLC, Waverly, NE |
|---|
| Title: | Efficacy of pre and postemergence herbicides on weed suppression in established turfgrass with a conventional and an ultra-low volume sprayer |
|---|
| Source: | Crop Protection. Vol. 89, November 2016, p. 72-77. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 6 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: 2,4-D; Comparisons; Dicamba; Digitaria sanguinalis; Equipment evaluation; Glechoma hederacea; Herbicide efficacy; Herbicide evaluation; Low volume spraying; Mesotrione; Spraying practices; Taraxacum officinale; Weed control
|
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Previous research has shown the effectiveness of an ULV (Ultra-Low Volume) sprayer compared to a conventional sprayer for weed control in row crop applications. This sprayer produced comparable disease control and foliar nutrient applications to a conventional sprayer in turfgrass, but has not previously been evaluated for weed control in established turf. Four weed control field studies were conducted in the spring and summer of 2012 and 2013 at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln: John Seaton Anderson Turfgrass Research Facility near Mead, NE, USA to compare the weed control efficacy between a novel ULV sprayer and a conventional sprayer. The studies compared the two sprayers for the control of: ground ivy and dandelion in established turf in a summer application; preemergence control of large crabgrass in established turf in a late spring application and ground ivy control in established turf in a late spring application. No differences were observed in weed control between sprayer types in the four studies over both years of the study despite a thirty fold decrease in application volume rate across different herbicide modes-of-action in all of the studies. The Kamterter ULV sprayer system may be a useful and effective management option for control of the weeds in turfgrass." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 36 |
|---|
| Note: | Pictures, b/w
Tables |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Ferguson, J. C., R. E. Gaussoin, J. A. Eastin, M. D. Sousek, and G. R. Kruger. 2016. Efficacy of pre and postemergence herbicides on weed suppression in established turfgrass with a conventional and an ultra-low volume sprayer. Crop Prot. 89:p. 72-77. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=273457 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 273457. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.07.006 |
| Web URL(s):
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219416301624
Last checked: 07/21/2016
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| 
MSU catalog number: b2337143 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
