Full TGIF Record # 288226
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH03614-16
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Warner, Laura A.; Ali, Amanda D.; Chaudhary, Anil Kumar
Author Affiliation:Warner: Department of Agricultural Education and Communication, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL and Center for Landscape Conservation and Ecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Ali and Chaudhary: Department of Agricultural Education and Communication, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL
Title:Perceived landscape benefits influence engagement in urban landscape irrigation and fertilizer best practices
Column Name:Extension education methods
Other records with the "Extension education methods" Column
Source:HortTechnology. Vol. 27, No. 3, June 2017, p. 424-430.
Publishing Information:Alexandria, Virginia: American Society for Horticultural Science
# of Pages:7
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Best management practices; Fertilization program; Irrigation systems; Landscape design; Maintenance by homeowners; Marketing tools; Public involvement; Urban landscaping; Water conservation; Water quality improvement
Abstract/Contents:"There are substantial opportunities for residents to conserve and protect water through irrigation and fertilizer best practices without sacrificing landscape quality. Promoting the adoption of practices and technologies to address water quality and quantity issues is one of the most important contributions extension can make to solving complex water problems. Extension needs to use innovative approaches to encourage adoption of landscape water conservation practices and technologies, and one underused behavior change strategy is social marketing. Social marketing can help extension encourage behavior change by positioning desired behaviors in terms of value to clientele. This study examined the relationship between the benefits people believe their home landscape provides and their engagement in good irrigation and fertilization practices. Aesthetics is the most valued landscape benefit but it is not strongly influential on good irrigation or fertilization practices. Individuals who perceive their landscape offers habitat benefits are most likely to engage in good irrigation practices, whereas individuals who believe their landscape provides environmental benefits are most likely to engage in good fertilization practices. People who believe their landscape offers monetary benefits are least likely to engage in good irrigation and good fertilizer practices. Extension professionals should develop programs that relate fertilization best practices to environmental benefits and irrigation best management practices to habitat benefits while emphasizing that landscape management best practices are compatible with landscape aesthetics."
Language:English
References:29
Note:Summary appears as abstract
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Warner, L. A., A. D. Ali, and A. K. Chaudhary. 2017. Perceived landscape benefits influence engagement in urban landscape irrigation and fertilizer best practices. HortTechnology. 27(3):p. 424-430.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=288226
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 288226.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.21273/HORTTECH03614-16
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2917674a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)