| |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105010 |
|---|
| Web URL(s): | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219419303564
Last checked: 12/01/21
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219419303564/pdfft?md5=30db68c42220bddddbddb1e5ae0a6f13&pid=1-s2.0-S0261219419303564-main.pdf
Last checked: 12/01/21
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Refereed |
|---|
| Author(s): | Krähmer, Hansjörg;
Andreasen, Christian;
Economou-Antonaka, Garifalia;
Holec, Josef;
Kalivas, Dionissios;
Kolářová, Michaela;
Novák, Robert;
Panozzo, Silvia;
Pinke, Gyula;
Salonen, Jukka;
Sattin, Maurizio;
Stefanic, Edita;
Vanaga, Ineta;
Fried, Guillaume |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Krähmer: Hofheim, Germany; Andreasen: Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark; Economou-Antonaka: Faculty of Crop Production Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Holec: Department of Agroecology and Crop Production, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Suchdol, Prague 6, Czech Republic; Kalivas: Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Kolářová: Department of Agroecology and Crop Production, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Suchdol, Prague 6, Czech Republic and Unité Entomologie et Plantes invasives, Anses - Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France; Novák: National Food Chain Safety Office, Directorate of Plant Protection, Soil Conservation and Agri-environment, Budapest, Hungary; Panozzo and Sattin: Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), National Research Council (CNR), Legnaro, PD, Italy; Pinke: Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary; Salonen: Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, Finland; Stefanic: Department for Plant Protection, Faculty of Agrobiotechnical Sciences, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; Vanaga: SIA Bayer, Bayer CropScience, Jelgava, Latvia; Fried: Unité Entomologie et Plantes invasives, Anses - Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France |
|---|
| Title: | Weed surveys and weed mapping in Europe: State of the art and future tasks |
|---|
| Source: | Crop Protection. Vol. 129, March 2020, p. 1-13. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 13 |
|---|
| Keywords: | Author-Supplied Keywords: Arable weeds; Biodiversity; Invasive weeds; Species distribution; Mapping methodology; Herbicide resistant weeds
|
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Long-term national European weed surveys, large scale classical phytosociological programs and camera-based documentation systems lead to results which can be documented in form of maps. Comparisons of these visual representations of relative weed positions can be used for the prediction of changing weed spectra and of plant biodiversity changes. Statistical methods connected with mapping software are used for the analysis of environmental factors and of farm managing practices influencing the occurrence of weeds. Maps produced by sensor-driven weed detection devices still differ considerably from maps produced via classical phytosociological approaches. Computer algorithms may allow the precise identification of some weeds in camera images. The present technical solutions are, however, still far from those achieved by experienced botanists. Many weed detection tools based on algorithms are not able to distinguish between closely related weeds yet. A few European countries have a long tradition of surveying weeds in major crops by traditional tools. Various software packages are employed for the analysis, documentation and visualisation of survey results. Large scale comprehensive maps including the infestation of crops over different countries are, however, often biased as not every national research group uses the same methods for the assessment of weed infestation. The ranking of the most common species seems, however, to allow comparable conclusions. The recognition of trends in spectrum changes can only be derived from long term studies as we see it. Our review reflects discussions within the Weed Mapping Working Group of the European Weed Research Society over the last ten years. We try to identify new research trends and to respond accordingly with new research projects. What we see today is a shift from traditional mapping approaches towards the use of digital devices as for example in precision farming projects. Another issue of increasing importance is the mapping of herbicide resistant biotypes." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 100+ |
|---|
| Note: | "Article 105010"
Maps
Pictures, b/w
Figures
Tables
Graphs |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Krähmer, H., C. Andreasen, G. Economou-Antonaka, J. Holec, D. Kalivas, M. Kolářová, et al. 2020. Weed surveys and weed mapping in Europe: State of the art and future tasks. Crop Prot. 129:p. 1-13. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=316192 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 316192. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105010 |
| Web URL(s):
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219419303564
Last checked: 12/01/21
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219419303564/pdfft?md5=30db68c42220bddddbddb1e5ae0a6f13&pid=1-s2.0-S0261219419303564-main.pdf
Last checked: 12/01/21
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| 
MSU catalog number: b2337143 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
