Full TGIF Record # 107797
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://crops.confex.com/crops/viewHandout.cgi?uploadid=9
    Last checked: 01/29/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Report
Material Type:Presentation
Author(s):Fry, Jack; McClellan, Ty; Keeley, Steve
Author Affiliation:Fry and Keeley: Department of Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS; McClellan: Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
Title:Ball mark repair and creeping bentgrass recovery
Section:C05 turfgrass science
Other records with the "C05 turfgrass science" Section

Establishment, cultivation, irrigation, and fertility
Other records with the "Establishment, cultivation, irrigation, and fertility" Section
Meeting Info.:Salt Lake City, UT: 7-10 November, 2005
Source:2005 Annual Meeting Abstracts [ASA/CSSA/SSSA/CSSS]. 2005, p. [1].
Publishing Information:[Madison, WI]: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America
# of Pages:1
Related Web URL:https://crops.confex.com/crops/2005am/techprogram/P4478.HTM
    Last checked: 01/29/2016
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Equipment; Ball marks; Agrostis stolonifera; Turf recovery; Techniques; Comparisons; Turfgrass quality
Cultivar Names:L-93
Abstract/Contents:"Ball marks result from golf ball impact on putting greens, and recovery of the surface may depend upon the repair technique. Our objective was to compare five ball mark repair techniques for their influence on golf green surface quality and L-93 creeping bentgrass recovery. Studies were conducted on a practice putting green on a golf course (Study I) and also on a research green (Study II) in Manhattan, Kansas. Marks were made by a golfer striking golf balls with a pitching wedge from 100 m in Study I and from 70 m in Study II. Five treatments were imposed on the ball marks immediately after they were created: 1) no ball mark (control); 2) unrepaired ball mark; 3) Greenfix tool; 4) traditional ball mark repair tool used improperly; and 5) traditional ball mark repair tool used properly. In both studies, ball marks repaired properly with the traditional tool or with the Greenfix tool recovered completely in 16 to 21 days; recovery was 4 days faster with the Greenfix tool in Study I. Marks repaired with the Greenfix tool had poorer surface quality due to the presence of an uneven surface at 3 days after the ball mark was made (ABM) in Study I and at 3 and 10 days ABM in Study II. Using the traditional tool improperly resulted in the poorest surface quality at >17 days ABM due to poor turf quality in the mark area. Improperly repaired marks required >38 days for recovery. Proper use of the traditional tool or use of the Greenfix tool allowed for most rapid improvement in creeping bentgrass surface quality and fewest days to recovery; however, improper use of the traditional tool more than doubled ball mark recovery time. Results are available in Applied Turfgrass Science and can be viewed online at http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/ats/."
Language:English
References:0
See Also:See also related article "Evaluation of ball mark repair methods and creeping bentgrass recovery" K-State Turfgrass Research 2004, June 2004, p. 41-45, R=104822. R=104822

See also related article "Ball mark repair and creeping bentgrass recovery" Applied Turfgrass Research, August 1 2005, p. 1-9, R=105578. R=105578

See also related article "Proper ball mark repair cuts turf recovery time" Golf Course Management, 74(2) February 2006, p. 97-100, R=109653. R=109653
Note:Pictures, color
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Fry, J., T. McClellan, and S. Keeley. 2005. Ball mark repair and creeping bentgrass recovery. Annu. Meet. Abstr. p. [1].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=107797
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 107797.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://crops.confex.com/crops/viewHandout.cgi?uploadid=9
    Last checked: 01/29/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)