| |
| Web URL(s): | https://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/trial/fntests/reports/2006/T011.pdf
Last checked: 11/14/2016
Requires: PDF Reader |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Report |
|---|
| Author(s): | Luc, J. E.;
Martin, S. B. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Clemson University, Florence, South Carolina |
|---|
| Title: | Control of spring dead spot in bermudagrass golf course fairways in South Carolina, 2004-2005 |
|---|
| Section: | Turfgrass
Other records with the "Turfgrass" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | F&N Tests. Vol. 61, 2006, p. T011. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 2 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Cynodon dactylon; Cynodon transvaalensis; Spring dead spot; Disease control; Disease severity; Fungicide trials; Application rates; Golf greens
|
|---|
| Cultivar Names: | Tifway |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Two experiments were conducted on four golf course fairways at Camden (2 sites), Jefferson (1), and Columbia (1) in South Carolina. The fairways at all locations were mature stands (10 to 20-yr old) of bermudagrass with histories of spring dead spot damage. Turf was mowed 2 to 3 times per week to a height of 0.5 to 0.625-in during the growing season. Aerification was performed 1 to 3 times per season. Turf was fertilized with approximately 0.25 to 0.4 lb nitrogen per 1000 sq ft. per month. Irrigation with 0.25 in of water was applied as needed. Plots were 6 ft x 20 ft and were visually evaluated prior to treatment for disease severity per plot in Jun 04. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design, blocked based on spring dead spot severity the previous spring, and replicated four times on each fairway. Fungicides were applied in water equivalent to 1 gal per 1000 sq ft with a CO2 -powered sprayed at 34 psi using TeeJet 8002 flat-fanned nozzles. Fungicides were applied as single or multiple applications as noted in Table 1 and 2 footnotes. Immediately following fungicide treatments, the plots were irrigated with 0.25 in of water to move the fungicides into the rootzone. The experiments compared differences between treatment plots for percent disease of spring dead spot. Data were analyzed using SAS PROC MIXED procedure with treatment means separated using Tukey-Kramer procedures with α = 0.05. No interaction between treatment and location were observed, so treatment group data from each fairway were combined to give a better estimation of treatment means and standard errors. Differences in percent disease were observed on 28 Apr 05 and 27 May 05 with multiple applications of Rubigan, Banner Maxx, Heritage and Heritage TL. However, Eagle, Clearys 3336, Primo Maxx, Insignia, V10116, Heritage 0.2 oz followed by Banner Maxx 4 fl oz, and single applications or application made 4 weeks apart of Rubigan 4 fl oz were less effective. The treatment with the greatest disease reduction was 4 oz. of Banner Maxx applied on 1 Sep 04 and 15 Sep 04 with an 89% reduction compared to untreated control plots." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| Note: | Tables |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Luc, J. E., and S. B. Martin. 2006. Control of spring dead spot in bermudagrass golf course fairways in South Carolina, 2004-2005. F&N Tests. 61:p. T011. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=124110 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 124110. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
https://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/trial/fntests/reports/2006/T011.pdf
Last checked: 11/14/2016
Requires: PDF Reader |
| 
MSU catalog number: SB 951.3 .F82 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
