Full TGIF Record # 131330
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1094/ATS-2007-1218-01-RS
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/4/1/2007-1218-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/4/1/2007-1218-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Vincelli, Paul; Dixon, Ed
Author Affiliation:Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Title:Does spray coverage influence fungicide efficacy against dollar spot?
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. Vol. 4, No. 1, December 2007, p. [1-5].
Publishing Information:Plant Management Network
# of Pages:5
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/4/1/2007-1218-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Coverage; Sprayers; Dollar spot; Chlorothalonil; Nozzles; Fungicides; Agrostis stolonifera; Spray volumes; Spraying pressure; Disease control
Abstract/Contents:"Chlorothalonil and myclobutanil were applied separately to creeping bentgrass using two sets of nozzles: two low-drift nozzles that provided incomplete coverage [Teejet Turbo Turfjet nozzle (1/4TTJ04-VS) and the Raindrop RA-4 nozzle (35654-2)], and two nozzles that provided nearly complete coverage [XR Teejet flat fan nozzle (XR11004-VS) and the Teejet Air Induction nozzle (AI1004-VS)], as assessed using water-sensitive paper. Spray volume and pressure were equivalent with all nozzles. For both fungicides tested, in 48% of our assessment dates over four trials, the complete-coverage nozzles controlled dollar spot better (P < 0.1) than one or both nozzles that provided incomplete coverage. We saw no instance when nozzles providing incomplete coverage controlled dollar spot better than nozzles providing complete coverage. These results support the hypothesis that achieving complete spray coverage with fungicide provides more consistent control of dollar spot than incomplete spray coverage."
Language:English
References:11
See Also:See also related article "Improving spray coverage improves dollar spot control: Using the right nozzle to apply fungicide can save your grass" Golf Course Management, 76(2) February 2008, p. 114-116 R=132687 R=132687
Note:Pictures, b/w
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Vincelli, P., and E. Dixon. 2007. Does spray coverage influence fungicide efficacy against dollar spot?. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 4(1):p. [1-5].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=131330
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 131330.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2007-1218-01-RS
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/4/1/2007-1218-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/4/1/2007-1218-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)