| |
DOI: | 10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1 |
Web URL(s): | http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1 Last checked: 02/18/2011 Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1 Last checked: 02/18/2011 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
Publication Type:
| Refereed |
Author(s): | Gannon, Travis W.;
Yelverton, Fred H. |
Author Affiliation: | Gannon: Research Associate; Yelverton: Professor, Department of North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC |
Title: | Application placement equipment for bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) suppression along roadsides |
Section: | Weed management - other crops/areas Other records with the "Weed management - other crops/areas" Section
|
Source: | Weed Technology. Vol. 25, No. 1, January-March 2011, p. 77-83. |
Publishing Information: | Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. |
# of Pages: | 7 |
Related Web URL: | http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1 Last checked: 02/18/2011 Notes: Abstract only |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Application efficiency; Applicator testing; Burch wet blade; Centrifugal spreaders; Height; Low volume spraying; Paspalum notatum; Pesticide application; Phytotoxicity; Plant growth regulators; Seedhead inhibition; Spraying equipment
|
Abstract/Contents: | "Experiments were initiated during 2003 and 2004 to evaluate application placement equipment for plant growth regulator (PGR) applications along bahiagrass roadsides. Recently designed equipment combine low-volume application and pesticide placement technology. Application placement equipment conceal the image of a traditional spray application. Evaluated application placement equipment included a wet-blade mower (Burch Wet Blade) and rotary-wick applicator (Weedbug™) compared with a traditional broadcast spray. Wet-blade mowers are designed to mow and simultaneously apply a pesticide solution to a cut stem or leaf in a single pass, whereas rotary-wick applicators are designed to wick a solution onto foliage. Evaluated PGRs included imazapic (9, 35, or 53 g ha-1) and sulfometuron-methyl (26 g ha-1). Bahiagrass injury varied with application placement equipment and was greater with rotary-wick applications in 2003, compared with foliar broadcast applications and the wet-blade mower. Bahiagrass seedhead suppression ranged from 31 to 60% with application placement equipment in July 2003 compared with 93% for a broadcast spray. In 2004, rotary wick- or broadcast-applied PGRs provided excellent (>?90%) seedhead suppression. Although application placement equipment may have advantages to broadcast-spray applications, evaluated equipment did not enhance bahiagrass suppression along roadsides in North Carolina compared with a foliar broadcast spray. Additional research is needed to determine if this type of application may provide consistent results with other species and compounds." |
Language: | English |
References: | 33 |
Note: | Abstract appears in English and Spanish Tables |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): Gannon, T. W., and F. H. Yelverton. 2011. Application placement equipment for bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) suppression along roadsides. Weed Technol. 25(1):p. 77-83. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=176160 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 176160. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1 |
| Web URL(s): http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1 Last checked: 02/18/2011 Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1 Last checked: 02/18/2011 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| MSU catalog number: b2174615a |
| Find from within TIC: Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |