Full TGIF Record # 176160
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1
Web URL(s):http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1
    Last checked: 02/18/2011
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1
    Last checked: 02/18/2011
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Gannon, Travis W.; Yelverton, Fred H.
Author Affiliation:Gannon: Research Associate; Yelverton: Professor, Department of North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Title:Application placement equipment for bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) suppression along roadsides
Section:Weed management - other crops/areas
Other records with the "Weed management - other crops/areas" Section
Source:Weed Technology. Vol. 25, No. 1, January-March 2011, p. 77-83.
Publishing Information:Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.
# of Pages:7
Related Web URL:http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1
    Last checked: 02/18/2011
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Application efficiency; Applicator testing; Burch wet blade; Centrifugal spreaders; Height; Low volume spraying; Paspalum notatum; Pesticide application; Phytotoxicity; Plant growth regulators; Seedhead inhibition; Spraying equipment
Abstract/Contents:"Experiments were initiated during 2003 and 2004 to evaluate application placement equipment for plant growth regulator (PGR) applications along bahiagrass roadsides. Recently designed equipment combine low-volume application and pesticide placement technology. Application placement equipment conceal the image of a traditional spray application. Evaluated application placement equipment included a wet-blade mower (Burch Wet Blade) and rotary-wick applicator (Weedbug™) compared with a traditional broadcast spray. Wet-blade mowers are designed to mow and simultaneously apply a pesticide solution to a cut stem or leaf in a single pass, whereas rotary-wick applicators are designed to wick a solution onto foliage. Evaluated PGRs included imazapic (9, 35, or 53 g ha-1) and sulfometuron-methyl (26 g ha-1). Bahiagrass injury varied with application placement equipment and was greater with rotary-wick applications in 2003, compared with foliar broadcast applications and the wet-blade mower. Bahiagrass seedhead suppression ranged from 31 to 60% with application placement equipment in July 2003 compared with 93% for a broadcast spray. In 2004, rotary wick- or broadcast-applied PGRs provided excellent (>?90%) seedhead suppression. Although application placement equipment may have advantages to broadcast-spray applications, evaluated equipment did not enhance bahiagrass suppression along roadsides in North Carolina compared with a foliar broadcast spray. Additional research is needed to determine if this type of application may provide consistent results with other species and compounds."
Language:English
References:33
Note:Abstract appears in English and Spanish
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Gannon, T. W., and F. H. Yelverton. 2011. Application placement equipment for bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) suppression along roadsides. Weed Technol. 25(1):p. 77-83.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=176160
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 176160.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1
Web URL(s):
http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1
    Last checked: 02/18/2011
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/WT-D-10-00074.1
    Last checked: 02/18/2011
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2174615a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)