Full TGIF Record # 290338
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2017am/webprogram/Paper106796.html
    Last checked: 10/13/2017
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Henke, Benjamin; Soldat, Douglas J.; Kreuser, William Collin
Author Affiliation:Henke: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI; Soldat: Ph.D. and University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Kreuser: Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Title:Growing degree day models for plant growth regulators applied to creeping bentgrass and Kentucky bluegrass
Section:C05 Turfgrass Science
Other records with the "C05 Turfgrass Science" Section

Turf weed management and plant growth regulators (includes student competition)
Other records with the "Turf weed management and plant growth regulators (includes student competition)" Section
Meeting Info.:Tampa, Florida: October 22-25, 2017
Source:ASA, CSSA and SSSA International Annual Meetings. 2017, p. 106796.
Publishing Information:[Milwaukee, Wisconsin]: [American Society of Agronomy and the Entomological Society of America]
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Application rates; Application timing; Efficiency; Growing degree days; Models; Plant growth regulators; Poa pratensis
Abstract/Contents:"Growing Degree Day Models for Plant Growth Regulators Applied to Creeping Bentgrass and Kentucky Bluegrass Authors: Henke, Soldat, Kreuser Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) are widely used in the turfgrass industry. PGR efficacy has been related to more metabolism in the plant. Recent studies have shown applying trinexapac-ethyl based on of growing degree days (GDD) can predict more precise re-application intervals than standard calendar applications. The objective of this study was to determine if GDD models could be developed for PGRs on creeping bentgrass and Kentucky bluegrass fairways and quantify the impact of application rate on growth suppression. Treatments consisted of six PGRs at two application rates. Applications were made at the beginning of May, June, July and August on previously non-treated turfgrass at sites in Nebraska and Wisconsin. Higher applications rate generally resulted in higher percent suppression and longer re-application intervals. PGRs applied to creeping bentgrass at high rates reduced growth by 53 to 87%, while low rates reduced growth from 36 to 70%. Growth regulation was less effective on Kentucky bluegrass where the high rates suppressed growth by 23 to 63% and low rates reduced growth by only 18 to 48%. These results suggest that PGRs are less effective on Kentucky bluegrass fairways compared to creeping bentgrass fairways."
Language:English
References:0
See Also:See also related item "Creating growing degree day models for six commonly used plant growth regulators"Wisconsin Turfgrass News, 31(1) Spring 2017, p. 4-5, R=334972, R=334972

See also related item "Creating GDD models for plant growth regulators on athletic fields and fairways" Wisconsin Turfgrass Field Day, 2016, p. 14-16, R=335785. R=335785
Note:This item is an abstract only!
"271-4"
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Henke, B., D. J. Soldat, and W. C. Kreuser. 2017. Growing degree day models for plant growth regulators applied to creeping bentgrass and Kentucky bluegrass. Agron. Abr. p. 106796.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=290338
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 290338.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2017am/webprogram/Paper106796.html
    Last checked: 10/13/2017
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)