| |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jeq2.20222 |
|---|
| Web URL(s): | https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jeq2.20222
Last checked: 11/16/2021
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jeq2.20222
Last checked: 11/16/2021
Requires: PDF Reader |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Refereed |
|---|
| Author(s): | Law, Quincy D.;
Trappe, Jon M.;
Braun, Ross C.;
Patton, Aaron J. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Law, Braun, and Patton: Dep. of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN; Trappe: Midwestern BioAg, Madison, WI |
|---|
| Title: | Greenhouse gas fluxes from turfgrass systems: Species, growth rate, clipping management, and environmental effects |
|---|
| Section: | Technical reports
Other records with the "Technical reports" Section
Atmospheric pollutants and trace gases
Other records with the "Atmospheric pollutants and trace gases" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | Journal of Environmental Quality. Vol. 50, No. 3, May/June 2021, p. 547-557. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 11 |
|---|
| Related Web URL: | https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jeq2.20222
Last checked: 11/16/2021
Notes: Abstract only |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Turfgrass systems can be an important source or sink for greenhouse gases (GHG), including carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4). Further research is required in turfgrass systems; therefore, our objectives were to evaluate the effects of turfgrass species, growth rate, clipping management, and environmental conditions on GHG emissions. Greenhouse gas fluxes were measured in two separate field experiments in West Lafayette, IN. Experiment 1 investigated GHG flux in three cool-season (C3) and two warm-season (C4) turfgrass species during two growing seasons. Experiment 2 investigated fluxes in two C3 cultivars with varying growth rates and under different clipping management regimes. The C3 turfgrasses had the highest mean CO2 flux rates ranging from 0.373 to 0.431 g CO2-C m-2 h-1 compared with 0.273 to 0.361 g CO2-C m-2 h-1 for C4 turfgrasses. Mean hourly N2O flux rates ranged from 43.3 to 50.9 µg N2O-N m-2 h-1 for C3 compared with 11.1 to 14.4 µg N2O-N m-2 h-1 for C4 turfgrasses. Methane flux was more variable across time, but overall C4 turfgrasses were more likely to be a CH4 source, whereas C3 turfgrasses were often a CH4 sink. Growth rate and grass clipping management treatments had negligible impact on measured GHG flux. The differences in management practices specific to C3 and C4 turfgrasses had the largest impact on GHG flux. Results indicate the impact and importance of turfgrass species selection on GHG flux and also provide more information on our overall understanding on carbon and nitrogen cycling in urban soils." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 69 |
|---|
| Note: | Tables
Graphs |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Law, Q. D., J. M. Trappe, R. C. Braun, and A. J. Patton. 2021. Greenhouse gas fluxes from turfgrass systems: Species, growth rate, clipping management, and environmental effects. J. Environ. Qual. 50(3):p. 547-557. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=315969 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 315969. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20222 |
| Web URL(s):
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jeq2.20222
Last checked: 11/16/2021
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jeq2.20222
Last checked: 11/16/2021
Requires: PDF Reader |
| 
MSU catalog number: b2225072a |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
