| |
| Web URL(s): | https://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/WSSA-Virtual-Annual-Meeting-all-abstracts-updated-4-12-2021ab_FINAL.pdf#page=88
Last checked: 11/01/2022
Requires: PDF Reader
Notes: Item is within a single large file |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Report |
|---|
| Content Type: | Abstract or Summary Only |
|---|
| Author(s): | House, Mason T.;
Howard, Zachary S.;
Nolte, Scott A. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | House and Howard: Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Nolte: Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, College Station, TX |
|---|
| Title: | The impact of application equipment and methodology on hexazinone efficacy for controlling smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus) |
|---|
| Section: | MS poster contest
Other records with the "MS poster contest" Section
|
|---|
| Meeting Info.: | February 15-19, 2021 |
|---|
| Source: | Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America. 2021, p. 88. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | [United States]: Weed Science Society of America |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 1 |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "The broad range of variables involved in herbicide applications can make achieving effective weed control very challenging. These variables include application timing, methodology, weather and many other factors. The impacts of some of these variables have been researched extensively in several weed species; however, no research has been published evaluating application nozzle type and the methodology required to significantly improve smutgrass control. The research presented compares flat-fan air-induction nozzles to bi-directional nozzles by spraying hexazinone through both nozzles in addition to data collected regarding how the location on the plant the hexazinone is applied to impacts hexazinone's efficacy. Both studies were conducted at two locations in Brazos County, TX. The 2019 trial of the nozzle study found that glyphosate at 2.33 L hA-1 followed by hexazinone at 5.26 L hA-1 resulted in 100% control approximately 1 year after application while not being significantly more damaging to the bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) within the plots than the untreated check. However, both nozzles resulted in 100% control with this herbicide treatment, which means there was no difference in control that could be contributed to the nozzles. In terms of hexazinone site of application, there was no significant difference in smutgrass control between sites, but there was significant difference in terms of injury to surrounding bermudagrass" |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| See Also: | Related abstract appears in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society 74th Annual Meeting, Vol. 74 2021, p. 154 with variant title "The impact of nozzle selection on herbicide efficacy for controlling smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus), R=319794. R=319794 |
|---|
| Note: | This item is an abstract only! |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
House, M. T., Z. S. Howard, and S. A. Nolte. 2021. The impact of application equipment and methodology on hexazinone efficacy for controlling smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus). Abstr. Annu. Meet. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 88. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=322701 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 322701. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
https://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/WSSA-Virtual-Annual-Meeting-all-abstracts-updated-4-12-2021ab_FINAL.pdf#page=88
Last checked: 11/01/2022
Requires: PDF Reader
Notes: Item is within a single large file |
| 
MSU catalog number: b2180085 |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
