| |
| Web URL(s): | http://www.newss.org/proceedings/proceedings_1995_vol49.pdf#page=47
Last checked: 07/24/2013
Requires: PDF Reader
Notes: Item is within a single large file |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Report |
|---|
| Author(s): | Spackman, Chad W.;
Gover, Arthur E.;
Parks, Robert W.;
Johnson, Jon M.;
Kuhns, Larry J. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Research Technologist; Project Associate; Research Technician; Project Assistant; and Professor of Ornamental Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. |
|---|
| Title: | Comparison of fall and spring herbicide applications for total vegetation control under guiderails |
|---|
| Meeting Info.: | Boston, MA; January 2-5, 1995 |
|---|
| Source: | Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Weed Science Society. Vol. 49, 1995, p. 47-48. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Ithaca, NY: Northeastern Weed Science Society |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 2 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Spring weed control; Herbicide application; Comparisons; Fall fertilization; Application timing; Weed control
|
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "As part of an ongoing research project funded by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, a trial comparing total vegetation control provided by fall and spring applications of three herbicide combinations was established along a guiderail near State College, PA. If fall applications of bare ground herbicide treatments were as effective as spring treatments, this would widen the application window, and provide more flexibility in scheduling such treatments...The results of this test suggest that even late fall applications of non-selective herbicides do not provide enough residual activity to provide acceptable weed control the following spring, at least when spring-applied rates are used. These treatments can not be applied much later in the fall, as the weather becomes much more uncertain. During the winter of 1993/1994, there was continuous snow cover from mid-December to late March. Based on the results of this , and previous trials, it appears that higher application rates will have to be part of future investigations into late fall herbicide applications for total vegetation control." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| Note: | Table |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Spackman, C. W., A. E. Gover, R. W. Parks, J. M. Johnson, and L. J. Kuhns. 1995. Comparison of fall and spring herbicide applications for total vegetation control under guiderails. Proc. Annu. Meet. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:p. 47-48. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=36990 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 36990. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
http://www.newss.org/proceedings/proceedings_1995_vol49.pdf#page=47
Last checked: 07/24/2013
Requires: PDF Reader
Notes: Item is within a single large file |
| 
MSU catalog number: SB 610 .N62 v. 49 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by file name: newss1995 |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
