| |
| Web URL(s): | http://cutt.lib.msu.edu/article/1994sum6.pdf
Last checked: 04/06/2010
Requires: PDF Reader |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Professional |
|---|
| Author(s): | Hummel, Norman W. Jr. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture |
|---|
| Title: | Muck vs. mineral grown sod: The controversy continues |
|---|
| Source: | CUTT. Vol. 5, No. 2, Summer 1994, p. 6. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Ithaca, NY: Cornell Cooperative Extension |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 1 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: 2,4-D + Mecoprop; Mineral soils; Muck soils; Rooting capacity; Sod rooting; Sod transplanting; Sodding
|
|---|
| Trade Names: | Com-trol |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | Studies have shown that there is an advantage in using mineral sod in a short term period. Studies have also shown that there are no disadvantages in using muck in a long term period. "Proper soil preparation and post transplant care are very important in the success of a sod planting. Be sure that you properly prepare the soil prior to establishment, make sure the soil is moist when laying the sod, and be sure to water frequently until the sod is firmly rooted." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| Note: | Pictures, b/w
Tables |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Hummel, N. W. Jr. 1994. Muck vs. mineral grown sod: The controversy continues. CUTT. 5(2):p. 6. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=39519 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 39519. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
http://cutt.lib.msu.edu/article/1994sum6.pdf
Last checked: 04/06/2010
Requires: PDF Reader |
| 
MSU catalog number: SB 433 .C83 |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
