Full TGIF Record # 60913
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://www.crops.org/publications/cs/pdfs/39/4/CS0390041142
    Last checked: 08/05/2010
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.wctaturf.com/topics/repage/rejune00.html
    Last checked: 06/12/2012
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Bell, G. E.; Danneberger, T. K.
Author Affiliation:Bell: Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecure, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK; and Danneberger: Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Title:Temporal shade on creeping bentgrass turf
Section:Turfgrass science
Other records with the "Turfgrass science" Section
Source:Crop Science. Vol. 39, No. 4, July/August 1999, p. 1142-1146.
Publishing Information:Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America
# of Pages:5
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Shade; Time-of-day; Color; Shoot density; Root weight; Pigments; Total nonstructural carbohydrate content; Canopy temperature; Shade stress
Abstract/Contents:"Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) turf exposed to shade during morning hours may decline more readily than similar turf exposed to afternoon shade. This study compared the qality and physiological responses of creeping bentgrass turf exposed to morning shade with turf exposed to afternoon shade and evaluated responses of the same species exposed to varying shade densities during the same period. Semipermanent shade structures were placed on a creeping bentgrass range maintained at a 6.4-mm height. Structures provided 6 h of morning shade or 6 h of afternoon shade during the summer solstice. Each structure was covered with either 80 or 100% shade cloth and replicated three times. Control treatments of full sun and perpetual shade were also included. Treated turf was evaluated monthly for color, density, root mass, pigment concentrations, and total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC). Regardless of response tested, no significant variation was found between plots receiving morning shade and afternoon shade or between plots in 80 and 100% shade. Canopy temperature, in comparison with air temperature, was 7% greater in morning shade than in afternoon shade, but the relationship between canopy temperatures in full sun and shade did not change during the day. Perpetual shade caused a 38% decrease in color and a 33% decline in density but treatments receiving 6 h of shade did not vary from the full sun treatment. Concentrations of chlorophyll a (46%) and b (50%), neoxanthin (31%), violaxanthin (44%), and lutein (34%) declined in perpetual shade compared with full sun. Violaxanthin concentration was influenced by photosynthetic photon flux, suggesting its potential use as a shade stress indicator."
Language:English
References:0
See Also:Other items relating to: SHADEC
Note:Partial reprint appears on Western Canada Turfgrass Association website, June/July 2000, p. [1]
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Bell, G. E., and T. K. Danneberger. 1999. Temporal shade on creeping bentgrass turf. Crop Sci. 39(4):p. 1142-1146.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=60913
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 60913.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://www.crops.org/publications/cs/pdfs/39/4/CS0390041142
    Last checked: 08/05/2010
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.wctaturf.com/topics/repage/rejune00.html
    Last checked: 06/12/2012
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 183 .C7
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)