Full TGIF Record # 64820
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2136/sssaj2000.64186x
    Last checked: 02/27/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2136/sssaj2000.64186x
    Last checked: 02/27/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Roy, J. W.; Parkin, G. W.; Wagner-Riddle, C.
Author Affiliation:Department of Land Resource Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Title:Water flow in unsaturated soil below turfgrass: Observations and LEACHM (within EXPRES) predictions
Source:Soil Science Society of America Journal. Vol. 64, No. 1, January/February 2000, p. 86-93.
Publishing Information:Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America
# of Pages:8
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Soil water movement; Nutrient transport; Root zone; Leaching; Sandy loam soils; Lysimeters; Poa pratensis; Hydraulic conductivity; Soil moisture; Drainage; Seasonal variation; Physical properties of soil; Water balance; Soil water retention; Models; Time domain reflectometry; Evapotranspiration; Soil water content
Abstract/Contents:"In cropped soils, water sustains the plants, affects the transport of nutrients within the root zone, and controls the leaching of nutrients and chemicals to ground water. The objectives of this study were (i) to investigate the effects of turfgrass on water flow in sandy loam soil during the growing season using field lysimeters, and (ii) to test the abilities of the models EXPRES and LEACHN with free-drainage and lysimeter bottom-boundary conditions, respectively, to simulate water movement in the lysimeters. Twelve field lysimeters were packed with a three-horizon profile, topped with Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) sod, and monitored for 2 yr. Saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured on cores, was much greater and more variable for turf than soil. The moisture-retention curve for turf also had a much steeper drop in water content at low applied negative head than soil. The lysimeters became very dry during the summer, and only drained during the spring and autumn. The model EXPRES generally predicted water flow well, but had some difficulty with water redistribution during the drying periods (gravity drainage and evapotranspiration). In general, with the free-drainage bottom-boundary condition, EXPRES predicted more drainage and less drying during the summer than was observed. Under conditions of little to no irrigation, the free-drainage condition over-predicted and the lysimeter condition under-predicted the total amount of measured drainage. Model predictions of drainage under heavily irrigated conditions were similar for both bottom-boundary conditions."
Language:English
References:29
Note:Figures
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Roy, J. W., G. W. Parkin, and C. Wagner-Riddle. 2000. Water flow in unsaturated soil below turfgrass: Observations and LEACHM (within EXPRES) predictions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64(1):p. 86-93.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=64820
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 64820.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2136/sssaj2000.64186x
    Last checked: 02/27/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2136/sssaj2000.64186x
    Last checked: 02/27/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: S 590 .S65
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)