Full TGIF Record # 65012
Item 1 of 1
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Hall, M. H.; Gaudreau, J. E.; White, R. H.; Menn, W. G.; Taylor, G. R. II
Author Affiliation:Menn: Lecturer, Turfgrass Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; White: Turfgrass Physiologist, Texas A&M University, College Station. TX; Taylor: Extension Turfgrass Specialist, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Hall: Research Associate, Turfgrass Physiology, Support Staff for Turfgrass Programs, The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Dallas, TX; Gaudreau: Graduate Student & Research Technician II, Turfgrass Mgt., Support Staff for Turfgrass Programs, The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Dallas, TX
Title:1997 National Turf Evaluation Program (NTEP) bermudagrass trial
Section:Cultivar development
Other records with the "Cultivar development" Section
Source:Texas Turfgrass Research - 1998. 1998, p. .
Publishing Information:College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station
# of Pages:12
Series:Texas Turfgrass Consolidated Progress Reports TURF-98-1 thru
98-30
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Choice of cultivar; Percent living ground cover; National Bermudagrass Test-1997; Cultivar evaluation; Genotypes; Cynodon dactylon; Cynodon transvaalensis; Establishment; Establishment rate; Quality; Leaf texture; Color; Autumn; Vegetative propagation; Seed propagation; Comparisons
Abstract/Contents:"A study, sponsored by the National Turf Evaluation Program (NTEP), was initiated in 1997 at the Texas A&M University Turfgrass Field Laboratory in College Station, TX to compare 19 seeded and 10 vegetatively propagated genotypes of bermudagrass. Jackpot, Arizona common, NuMex Sahara, Blue-Muda, Shangri La, and Majestic were the fastest to cover on all rating dates. By 5 weeks after planting, 10 of the 19 genotypes were over 85% covered. No statistical differences in turf quality were observed among genotypes on any single rating date. When ratings for the entire season were averaged, however, SWI-11, Sydney, Shangri La, Majestic and Princess were rated highest in quality. All improved genotypes had better quality then Arizona common. Princess had numerically better fall color than the other genotypes and was statistically superior to Blackjack, J-1224, Mirage, Sundevil II, and OKS 95-1, which were in the lowest statistical grouping for fall color. There were no differences in visually rated leaf texture between the seeded bermudagrass genotypes. OKC 18-4, Midlawn, Tifgreen, Cardinal, and Shanghai were rated highest for rate of coverage on all rating dates. By 12 weeks after planting, all entries except Mini-Verde were at least 88% covered. On all rating dates, Cardinal and Shanghai received visual quality ratings in the top statistical grouping, and CN 2-9, OKC 19-9, and Mini-Verde were rated in the lowest grouping. Overall, Cardinal, Shanghai, and OKC 18-4 exhibited the best quality. Cardinal, Tifway, CN 2-9, Midlawn, And TifSport exhibited the best color in November 1997, and had better color than all other genotypes except Shanghai. Mini-Verde and Cardinal were the finest textured vegetatively propogated entries and Shanghai was the coarsest."
Language:English
References:2
Note:Tables
December 1998
TURF-98-27
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Hall, M. H., J. E. Gaudreau, R. H. White, W. G. Menn, and G. R. II Taylor. 1998. 1997 National Turf Evaluation Program (NTEP) bermudagrass trial. Tex Turfgrass Res.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=65012
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 65012.
Choices for finding the above item:
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 433 .T42
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)