Full TGIF Record # 80985
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2136/sssaj2002.1115
    Last checked: 02/28/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2136/sssaj2002.1115
    Last checked: 02/28/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Rawls, W. J.; Pachepsky, Ya. A.
Author Affiliation:Rawls: USDA-ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab, BARC-WEST Beltsville, MD; Pachepsky: USDA-ARS Animal Wast Pathogen Lab, BARC-EAST, Beltsville, MD
Title:Soil consistence and structure as predictors of water retention
Section:Division S-1 - Soil physics
Other records with the "Division S-1 - Soil physics" Section
Source:Soil Science Society of America Journal. Vol. 66, No. 4, July/August 2002, p. 1115-1126.
Publishing Information:Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America
# of Pages:12
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Databases; Soil water retention; Estimation; Soil structure; Physical properties of soil; Hydraulic properties
Abstract/Contents:"It is impractical to measure water retention for large-scale hydrologic, agronomic, and ecological applications or at the design stages of many projects; therefore, water retention estimates are often used. Field soil descriptions routinely include structure and consistence characterization. The objective of this work was to use the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) database to evaluate the potential for structural and consistence properties to serve as predictors of soil hydraulics properties. Total of ≅2140 samples were found that had (i) values of water contents at -33 kPa and -1500 kPa, (ii) structure characterized with grade, size, and shape, (iii) consistence characterized with dry and moist consistency, stickiness, and plasticity, and (iv) textual class determined in the field and from lab textural analysis. Because structural and consistence parameters were represented by categories rather than numbers, regression trees were used for recursive partitioning of the data sets into groups to decrease overall variability measured as the sum of squared errors within groups. Plasticity class, grade class, and dry consistency class were leading predictors of water retention at both -33 kPa and -1500 kPa matric potentials. The accuracy of estimates from structural and consistency parameters was lower than from textural classes. Using soil structural and consistence parameters along with textural classes provided a small, although significant improvement in accuracy of water retention estimates as compared with estimation from texture alone. Soil structural and consistence parameters can serve as predictors of soil water retention because those parameters reflect soil basic properties that affect soil hydraulic properties."
Language:English
References:54
Note:Tables
Graphs
Charts
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Rawls, W. J., and Y. A. Pachepsky. 2002. Soil consistence and structure as predictors of water retention. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66(4):p. 1115-1126.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=80985
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 80985.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2136/sssaj2002.1115
    Last checked: 02/28/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2136/sssaj2002.1115
    Last checked: 02/28/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: S 590 .S65
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)